Decree - Judgment Search Results

The Decree-holder (The then Vs. Bearing No.2524/1988, Seeking

Court: Delhi

COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI Order pronounced on: 02.02.2012 + EX. P. No.286/2011 MS. ADARSH KAUR GILL ..... Decree Holder Through Mr. C.A. Sunderam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Munindra Dwivedi, Ms. Divya Bhalla and Mr. Zafar Inayat,

“that a Decree for Declaration to the Effect That Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J. Appellants along with others filed the instant suit seeking the following relief: “That a decree for declaration to the effect that plaintiffs have filed the present suit for declaration to the effect that

Tej Pal-decree-holder Vs. Tara Singh and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1914All467; 24Ind.Cas.93

this appeal are as follows : The appellant in this case sued on a mortgage and obtained a decree, in execution of which he purchased the mortgaged property. The respondents were impleaded in the suit as defendants

P.C. Herian vs (Decree Holder) Muthoot Vehicle and Asset Finance Ltd.

Court: Kerala

the year 2014. The attachmentwas effected in the E.P. subsequent to the purchase by the claim petitioner. The decree holder/1st respondent is canvassing a case that, the petitioner herein and the judgment debtors are colluding each other

Chakkunny, (Surety) Vs. Viswanatha Iyer, (Decree-holder)

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1961Ker312

Receiver was impleaded as additional defendant. Thereafter the plaintiff and the defendants entered into a compromise and a decree was passed in terms of the compromise. When the decree-holder sought to enforce the bond, the surety objected

Khub Chand Vs. Lachman Das-decree Holder

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1930All415; 122Ind.Cas.758

a suit brought by Mool Chand against Lachhman Das and Achru Lal in which Mool Chand obtained a decree for possession of certain property from the lower Courts and obtained possession in execution of that decree. Ultimately

Car-o-liner Ab..Decree Holder Vs.

Court: Delhi

the Objections filed by Mr Deepak Sharma to attachment of House No. N-30, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi.2. A decree for recovery of Rs 63,97,128.32/- with costs and pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 5.25%

“it Is Ordered That Decree for Declaration Is Hereby Vs. the Narnaul ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

is condoned. CMs stand disposed of. Rs.No.5153 of 2013(O&M) The appellant and proforma respondents filed a suit seeking decree for declaration to the effect that they are owners in possession of the suit land on the basis

“In the Instant Case the Learned Lower Court Which Passed the Ex-par ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

respondent No.1-plaintiff Nazar Singh s/o Midda Singh (for brevity “the plaintiff”.), had instituted the civil suit for a decree of possession in respect of suit property against petitioner-defendant No.4 Chinder Kaur d/o Ujaggar Singh, her brothers Gurbachan

Whether the Judgment and Decree Dated 18.03.1992 Passed in Civil Vs. S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

No.2 and 3. ****** HEMANT GUPTA, J. The plaintiff is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below whereby suit for declaration challenging the judgment and decree dated 18.03.1992 as not