Decree Holder - Judgment Search Results

The Decree-holder (The then Vs. Bearing No.2524/1988, Seeking

Court: Delhi

COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI Order pronounced on: 02.02.2012 + EX. P. No.286/2011 MS. ADARSH KAUR GILL ..... Decree Holder Through Mr. C.A. Sunderam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Munindra Dwivedi, Ms. Divya Bhalla and Mr. Zafar Inayat, Advs. … N. Sharma, Advs. for J.Ds. No.4 and .5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J..1. The decree-holder (the then plaintiff) on 10.10.1988 filed the suit bearing No.2524/1988, seeking relief for specific performance of the agreement

Tej Pal-decree-holder Vs. Tara Singh and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1914All467; 24Ind.Cas.93

this appeal are as follows : The appellant in this case sued on a mortgage and obtained a decree, in execution of which he purchased the mortgaged property. The respondents were impleaded in the suit as defendants

P.C. Herian vs (Decree Holder) Muthoot Vehicle and Asset Finance Ltd.

Court: Kerala

MURI, EZHUPUNNA VILLAGE, ERAMALLOOR P.O.CHERTHALA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 537. BY ADV JOBY CYRIAC RESPONDENTS/DECREE HOLDERS & JUDGMENT DEBTORS:1 (DECREE HOLDER) MUTHOOT VEHICLE AND ASSET FINANCE LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AT MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCE LTD), MUTHOOT CHAMBERS, BANERJI ROAD, … the year 2014. The attachmentwas effected in the E.P. subsequent to the purchase by the claim petitioner. The decree holder/1st respondent is canvassing a case that, the petitioner herein and the judgment debtors are colluding each other to

Chakkunny, (Surety) Vs. Viswanatha Iyer, (Decree-holder)

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1961Ker312

Receiver was impleaded as additional defendant. Thereafter the plaintiff and the defendants entered into a compromise and a decree was passed in terms of the compromise. When the decree-holder sought to enforce the bond, the surety objected

Khub Chand Vs. Lachman Das-decree Holder

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1930All415; 122Ind.Cas.758

Matched in: Parties Khub Chand Vs. Lachman Das-decree Holder

Car-o-liner Ab..Decree Holder Vs.

Court: Delhi

future interest at the rate of 5.25% per annum was passed by this Court in favour of the Decree Holder and against TTC Laser Machine Pvt. Ltd. on 08th February, 2007. Since the decree was passed only against … Ltd., the property, belonging to the company alone, could have been attached in execution of the decree.3. The Decree Holder filed 543/2007 seeking attachment of a number of properties, including House No. N-30, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi, alleging

The Lakshmi Commercial Bank Ltd., New Delhi, Decree Holder Vs. America ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1972Delhi118

Anand, Bhola Nath Jain etc., for recovery of Rs.48,796,08 with costs and future interest. It prayed for a decree for this amount against the defendants jointly and severally by sale of certain stocks pledged with the plaintiff

Jai Lal Sheo Chand, Decree-holder Vs. Bhu Dev Bhola Singh, Judgment-de ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1956P& H256

Matched in: Parties Jai Lal Sheo Chand, Decree-holder Vs. Bhu Dev Bhola Singh, Judgment-debtor

Duni Chand Ram Dass, Decree-holder Vs. Ibrahim and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1954P& H240

Kapur, J. 1. This is an appeal brought by the decree-holders against an order passed by the executing Court dated 22-10-1952 holding that as the property sought to be

Shib Nath Mukherjee, Judgment-debtor Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1961Cal170,65CWN766

the objection was taken that the Subordinate Judge, First Court, did not have jurisdiction to execute the mortgage decree which had been passed against the appellant. The mortgage decree was passed against the appellant by the First