Decree Holder - Judgment Search Results

The Decree-holder (The then Vs. Bearing No.2524/1988, Seeking

Court: Delhi

the sale deed has already executed in favour of the decree-holder after passing the decree..27. The similar question has arisen in of Mr. Ahuja that the relief sought by the decree holder for possession cannot be granted mainly on two reasons, namely,

Tej Pal-decree-holder Vs. Tara Singh and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1914All467; 24Ind.Cas.93

the respondents the argument is that the appellant is a decree-holder and in spite of his purchase the dispute between him

Chakkunny, (Surety) Vs. Viswanatha Iyer, (Decree-holder)

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1961Ker312

the bond should be deemed discharged as the suit was decreed on compromise and not on contest and as the first

Khub Chand Vs. Lachman Das-decree Holder

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1930All415; 122Ind.Cas.758

the lower Courts and obtained possession in execution of that decree. Ultimately his decree was set aside by the High Court

Uma Kanta Banerjee Vs. Renwick and Co. Ltd., Decree-holder and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1953Cal717,58CWN683

the above two cases laid down that holders of a decree in terms of Order 20, Rule 10 of the Code the first of the above two cases laid down that holders of a decree in terms of Order 20, Rule 10

Car-o-liner Ab..Decree Holder Vs.

Court: Delhi

could have been attached in execution of the decree.3. The Decree Holder filed 543/2007 seeking attachment of a number of properties, company. Also, this is not the case of the Decree Holder that this property was acquired from the funds of the

The Lakshmi Commercial Bank Ltd., New Delhi, Decree Holder Vs. America ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1972Delhi118

so mentioned in the decree. The liberty clause in the decree permitting the plaintiff to apply for personal decree does not

V. Sreenivasachariar Vs. Bysani Krishnayya Chetti Transferee Decree-ho ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1941Mad697; (1941)1MLJ833

payments and he said that these payments were 'towards the decree debt'. There the matter stands so far as the oral

Duni Chand Ram Dass, Decree-holder Vs. Ibrahim and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1954P& H240

facts in some detail. On 19-11-1947 the decree-holders got a decree for rupees ten thousand odd against Ibrahim. The decree-holders applied

Srimath Thirumala Venkata Srinivasacharyulu Ayyavarlam Garu and anr. V ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1945)2MLJ544

a transferee decree-holder, he was not entitled to execute the decree at all; and even if he were, he would be