Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Declaration - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 10 1922

Rathnamasari Declared Mad and ors. Vs. the Secretary of State for Indi ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-10-1922

Reported in: (1923)44MLJ132

Court the Tahsildar's reports of the 18th June, 1913 and the 26th September, 1913 and a special valuation statement submitted by him on the 12th June, 1913. With reference to that prayer we called for a report


Nov 01 1928

Rathinasabapathi Odayar Declared Major Vs. Gopala Odayar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-01-1928

Reported in: AIR1929Mad545; 121Ind.Cas.126; (1929)56MLJ673

not heirs but kinsmen. Para. 30 at page 33 is, Manu having premised two sets of six sons, declares the first six to be heirs and kinsmen, and the last to be not heirs but kinsmen:The true


Mar 23 2010

Vinayaka Mission University, (Declared Under Section 3 of the U.G.C. A ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-23-2010

in the letter of the petitioner dated 14.09.2009.2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is a Deemed University declared under Section 3 of U.G.C. Act by Notification dated 01.03.2001 of the Central Government. The petitioner deemed university


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 23 2013

Abroad. He Was Declared a Proclaimed Offender on May 2 2011. Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-23-2013

to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM not M-10860 o”2. abroad. He was declared a proclaimed offender on May 2, 2011. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had not received


Mar 07 2013

“1.........The State Has Given an Affidavit to Say That Only Propert ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-07-2013

from the order, passed by the learned Single Judge, reads as follows: - “1.........The State has given an affidavit to say that only properties in KhaSr.Nos.34//4/1-16 marlas and 40//16/2-8 marlas are available vacant lands. The Government shall


Sep 18 2013

a Prayer for Ante Dated Regularization Has Been Made to Declare the Vs ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

reported in the Digest?. RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J A prayer for ante dated regularization has been made to declare the period spent as a daily wage employee from 1991 to 1993 as part of regular service. The


Sep 09 2013

“1. Whether the Plaintiffs Are Entitled to Declaration to the Vs. Sm ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-09-2013

issues were framed by the Civil Court in that suit :- “1. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to declaration to the effect that orders dated 16.6.2003, 30.8.2005 and 14.2.2007 are illegal, null and void?. OPP2 Whether the


Oct 07 2013

“1. Whether the Plaintiff Is Entitled to Declaration as Prayed For? ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Oct-07-2013

On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues were framed: “1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to declaration as prayed for?. OPP2 Whether the plaintiff is owner in possession of suit property on the basis of


Feb 13 2014

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners Has Filed an Affidavit of Vs. Stat ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-13-2014

Kaur, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed an affidavit of petitioner No.2 regarding his date of birth alongwith photocopy of matriculation certificate in Court today, which is


Feb 17 2014

Till the End of His Cross-examination Based on the Affidavit Tendered ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-17-2014

PW Pritpal Singh has been partially cross-examined, his deposition till the end of his cross-examination based on the affidavit tendered by way of Khan Md.Firoz 2014.02.21 15:48 examination-in-chief has to be read in evidence or against the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial