Decidement - Judgment Search Results

Decided On: 10.02.2012 Vs. Mcd and ors

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2198/2011 Decided on: 10.02.2012 IN THE MATTER OF GOMTI PRASAD AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. M.M. Kashyap, Advocate versus

Decided On: 03.02.2012 Vs. Commissioner Mcd and anr

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3718/2011 Decided on: 03.02.2012 IN THE MATTER OF MOHD. IQBAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanobar Ali Qureshi, Advocate versus COMMISSIONER

Decided On: 01.04.2013 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

2013 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. W.P.No.613 of 2013 (O&M) Decided on:01. 04.2013 Dhanbir ....................Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .......................Respondents CORAM HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.S.SARON HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.P.BANGARH

Decided on 24.09.2013 Vs. General Public

Court: Punjab and Haryana

FAO No.1358 OF20061 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.1358 OF2006DECIDED ON2409.2013 Manohar Singh ..............Appellant versus General Public .............Respondent CORAM HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.S.SARON HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.P.BANGARH Present:- None. S.S.SARON,J The appeal...

Decided on : 27.05.2014 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

No.19384 of 2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.19384 of 2012 Decided on : 27.05.2014 Jagdish Singh and others ..Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE

Rsa No.791 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Ramauli Decided by the then Sub Judge I ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

judgment and decree dated 12.8.1995 passed in civil suit No.891 Rs.No.791 o”2. of 1995 titled Dharampal versus Ramauli decided by the then Sub Judge Ist Class, Palwal. The plaintiff has challenged the aforesaid decree on the ground

Dr. Subramanian Swamy Vs. Deciding Authority and Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1995CriLJ3380

Corruption Act, 1988, in compliance with his request made on 2-11-1993. The first respondent is described as 'the Deciding Authority and his Excellency the Governor of Tamil Nadu, Mardas.' The second respondent is the Hon'ble Chief Minister

“1. That Both the Parties Have Decided to Get their Marriage Vs.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

be withdrawn/ quashed. The terms and conditions of the settlement read as follows:-“1. That both the parties have decided to get their marriage dissolved by mutual consent in accordance with law. The appellant-Jagmeet Singh and Ramandeep Kaur-respondent