Decide - Judgment Search Results

Dr. Subramanian Swamy Vs. Deciding Authority and Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1995CriLJ3380

..... of corruption act 1988 is also justiciable according to him the governor while acting as deciding authority exercises his discretion under article 163 of the constitution of india in other ..... respondent to grant necessary sanction for prosecuting second respondent under section 19 first respondent is deciding authority governor of tamil nadu second respondent is chief minister of tamil nadu and third .....

Decided On: 01.04.2013 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... police escort for a period of forty eight hours to be decided by the concerned superintendent jail and intimation in this regard with ..... for a period of forty eight hours which is to be decided by the concerned superintendent of jail and intimation in this regard ..... armed police escort for a period of forty eight hours to be decided by the concerned superintendent jail for the purpose of delivery of .....

Decided on : 27.05.2014 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cwp no 19384 of 2012 decided on 27 05 2014 jagdish singh and others petitioners versus state of punjab and others ..... as the gram panchayat of village bajghera versus the financial commissioner revenue haryana and others decided on 07 05 2014 holding that the land vests in panchayat even if the same .....

Decided On: 10.02.2012 Vs. Mcd and ors

Court: Delhi

in the high court of delhi at new delhi w p c 2198 2011 decided on 10 02 2012 in the matter of gomti prasad and ors petitioners through mr .....

Decided On: 03.02.2012 Vs. Commissioner Mcd and anr

Court: Delhi

in the high court of delhi at new delhi w p c 3718 2011 decided on 03 02 2012 in the matter of mohd iqbal petitioner through mr sanobar ali .....

Decided on 24.09.2013 Vs. General Public

Court: Punjab and Haryana

fao no 1358 of20061 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh fao no 1358 of2006decided on2409 2013...

“1. That Both the Parties Have Decided to Get their Marriage Vs.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... terms and conditions of the settlement read as follows 1 that both the parties have decided to get their marriage dissolved by mutual consent in accordance with law the appellant jagmeet .....

Rsa No.791 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Ramauli Decided by the then Sub Judge I ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... civil suit no 891 rs no 791 o 2 of 1995 titled dharampal versus ramauli decided by the then sub judge ist class palwal the plaintiff has challenged the aforesaid decree .....

Excel Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1989(25)LC491(Bombay)

b lentin j 1 the petitioner is a public limited company which manufactures chemical products the petitioner uses white and...

Anup Prabha Bai Sethi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, M. P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [1962]44ITR237(MP)

dixit c j this is a reference under section 66 1 of the income tax act and the question raised...