Decidable - Judgment Search Results

Decided On: 01.04.2013 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

eight hours to Crl. W.P.No.613 of 2013 (O&M) 5 be decided by the concerned Superintendent Jail and intimation in this regard

Decided on : 27.05.2014 Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

village Bajghera Versus The Financial Commissioner (Revenue) Haryana and others. decided on 07.05.2014 holding that the land vests in Panchayat even

Decided On: 10.02.2012 Vs. Mcd and ors

Court: Delhi

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2198/2011 Decided on: 10.02.2012 IN THE MATTER OF GOMTI PRASAD AND ORS.

Decided On: 03.02.2012 Vs. Commissioner Mcd and anr

Court: Delhi

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3718/2011 Decided on: 03.02.2012 IN THE MATTER OF MOHD. IQBAL ..... Petitioner

Decided on 24.09.2013 Vs. General Public

Court: Punjab and Haryana

FAO No.1358 OF20061 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.1358 OF2006DECIDED ON2409.2013 Manohar Singh ..............Appellant...

Dr. Subramanian Swamy Vs. Deciding Authority and Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1995CriLJ3380

and on the other hand he has only impleaded the Deciding Authority under Section 19(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act,

Rsa No.791 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Ramauli Decided by the then Sub Judge I ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

suit No.891 Rs.No.791 o2. of 1995 titled Dharampal versus Ramauli decided by the then Sub Judge Ist Class, Palwal. The plaintiff

“1. That Both the Parties Have Decided to Get their Marriage Vs.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the settlement read as follows:-1. That both the parties have decided to get their marriage dissolved by mutual consent in accordance