Deceive - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: deceive Page 1 of about 25,524 results (0.052 seconds)Dejoseph Vs. Connecticut.
Court: US Supreme Court
dejoseph v connecticut 385 u s 982 1966 u s supreme court dejoseph v connecticut 385 u s 982 1966...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssam Oil Company Limited Vs. Commissioner of Taxes
Court: Guwahati
j m srivastava j 1 the five above noted references by the assam board of revenue hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTeekoy Rubbers (India) Ltd. Vs. State of KeralA.
Court: Kerala
Reported in: [1966]60ITR350(Ker)
m s menon c j this is a reference by the agricultural income tax appellate tribunal trivandrum under section 60...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUmesh Kumar Ips Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Public Pr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
..... not the case of the prosecution that the petitioner intended to deceive any person the allegations in the charge sheet were only ..... defraud 8221 are not synonymous with the words 8220 intent to deceive 8221 it requires some action resulting in a disadvantage which ..... charge sheet nor the documents annexed thereto allege that the person deceived i e either the secretary or the joint secretary ministry of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.V. Venugopal Vs. Ushodaya Enterprises and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: 2001(2)ALT42
..... phonetic similarity of the two names amritdhara and lakshmandhara is in our opinion likely to deceive or cause confusion we must consider the overall similarity of the two composite words amritdhara ..... require elaborate citation of authorities it is a remedy against a false representation tending to deceive customers into believing that the goods which the defendant is selling are really the plaintiff .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAravind Laboratories Vs. V. Annamalai Chettiar
Court: Chennai
Reported in: (1981)1MLJ75
..... according to the plaintiffs the defendant has successfully attempted to deceive the public and there is an infringement of the ..... any similarity between plaintiffs carton and defendant s carton to deceive the public 3 whether the plaintiffs and their predecessors ..... names amritdhara and lakshmandhara is in our opinion likely to deceive or cause confusion we must consider the overall similarity of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Umesh Kumar Ips Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its
Court: Andhra Pradesh
..... not the case of the prosecution that the petitioner intended to deceive any person the allegations in the charge sheet were only ..... defraud quot are not synonymous with the words quot intent to deceive quot it requires some action resulting in a disadvantage which ..... charge sheet nor the documents annexed thereto allege that the person deceived i e either the secretary or the joint secretary ministry of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGoogle Inc Vs. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Court: Australia High Court
..... post advertisement contained representations which were misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive 40 55 second the primary judge found that google had not made the representations ..... representation of an advertiser without appreciating the capacity of that representation to mislead or deceive may have resort to the statutory defence in those circumstances recognising that its business .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTScania Commercial Vehicles India Pvt Ltd Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
..... cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person or to make alter or destroy the whole ..... cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person or to make alter or destroy the whole .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrem Nath Mayer Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: AIR1972Cal261,76CWN459
..... an unwary purchaser of average intelligence and imperfect recollection would be deceived by the overall similarity of the two names having regard ..... and not deceptive yet under the circumstances they were calculated to deceive the public within the meaning of section 73 of the ..... marks mentioned above there is every likelihood of his being deceived into believing that he was getting a chaff cutter of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial