Dealer - Judgment Search Results

Tata Iisco Dealers' Association Vs. Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes

Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Reported in: (1990)76STC14Tribunal

been collected on the same goods when purchased by the dealer claiming exemption. Therefore, it is essential that validity and constitutionality

Delhi Petrol Dealer Association and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1999VAD(Delhi)365; 81(1999)DLT400

extended period, then the1. If the explana- 3. Terminatin of dealership will betion of the dealer Dealership in terminated.is not satisfactory,

Kamrup Medicine Dealers Association and anr. Vs. State of Assam and or ...

Court: Guwahati

Constitution, may for the purposes of the registration of a dealer and submission of the returns of sales tax include these

Mumbai Kerosene Dealers' Association and Others Vs. The State of Mahar ...

Court: Mumbai

and conditions of the licence issued under the Maharashtra Kerosene Dealers' Licencing Order, 1966. That enables the State to issue a

Delhi Pipe Dealers Association Vs. Indian Tube Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1975)45CompCas652NULL

to accept deliveries outside the State of Delhi, that the dealers in Delhi who had ordered their goods to be despatched

All Lpg Dealers Cum Transporters Association and ors Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

a transporter for carrying on his activity as an LPG dealer. According to him the evaluation criteria adopted by respondents is

Jharkhand Kerosene Dealers' Association Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2005(2)BLJR1492; [2005(3)JCR151(Jhr)]

The appellant in L.P.A. No. 417/2004 is the Jharkhand Kerosene Dealers' Association, whereas in the other appeal, being L.P.A. No. 416/2004,

Cal. Liquor Dealers Vs. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Liquor Dealers Association, a trade association of independent retail liquor dealers in California, claims over 3,000 members. [ Footnote 6 ]

Allied Dealers Vs. State of Orissa

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 37(1971)CLT1218; [1972]29STC484(Orissa)

Lal and K.C. Panda were not partners of the Allied Dealers during the impugned periods. They became partners subsequent to 31st

Lubricating Oil Dealers’ Association and Another Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Kolkata

the District Magistrates, to interfere with the business of a dealer of lubricating oil.25. The most controversial point raised by the