Deafness - Judgment Search Results
Deaf Employees Welf.Association and anr Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
Writ Petition has been preferred by two Associations representing the Deaf and Dumb persons seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the
Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. All India Deaf and Dumb Society
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2005
Reported in: (2005)198CTR(Del)376; [2006]283ITR113(Delhi)
same in cash, as the Society runs a school for deaf and dumb children/persons. All the expenses are met from the
Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. All India Deaf and Dumb Society
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2005
Reported in: (2006)198CTR(Del)376
same in cash, as the society runs a school for deaf and dumb children/persons. All the expenses are met from the
The State of Gujarat Vs. One Deaf and Dumb Man
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-20-1967
Reported in: 1969CriLJ328
The Medical Officer certified that the accused appeared to be deaf and dumb. The learned Judicial Magistrate relied upon that certificate
Rajinder Kumar Vs. All India Deaf and Dumb Society
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-1996
A.P. Chowdhri, President: 1. Â All India Deaf and Dumb Society (Regd.), arrayed as opposite party in this
Emperor Vs. a Deaf and Dumb Accused
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-31-1916
Reported in: (1916)ILR40Bom598
Batchelor, J.1. In this case the accused, a deaf and dumb man, has been convicted of theft under Section
Emperor Vs. a Deaf and Dumb
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-31-1916
Reported in: AIR1917Bom288; 37Ind.Cas.495
1. In this case the accused, a deaf and dumb man, has been convicted of theft under Section
Emperor Vs. a Deaf and Dumb
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-31-1916
Reported in: 37Ind.Cas.495
1. In this case the accused, a deaf and dumb man, has been convicted of theft under Section
Bombay Institution for Deaf and Mutes and anr. Vs. Department of Socia ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-24-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)ALLMR1038; 2002(2)BomCR156; 2002(1)MhLj354
to the School run by the petitioners.2. Bombay Institutions for Deaf and Mutes is petitioner No. 1 before us which is
Mr. Rajiv Kumar (Deaf and Dumb) Vs. Kewal Cargo Carriers (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2006
Reported in: AIR2007Delhi27; 2006(90)DRJ222
of which RFA No. 291/2004 has arisen. The plaintiff, a deaf and dumb person, filed a suit through his next friend
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »