Deafness - Judgment Search Results

Deaf Employees Welf.Association and anr Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

.. Respondents JUDGMENT K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.1. This Writ Petition has been preferred by two Associations representing the Deaf and Dumb persons seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the Central and State Governments to grant transport allowance

MUNIYAPILLLAI (Deaf and Dumb) Vs The District Collector

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 15-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 24558 OF 2026 MUNIYAPILLLAI (Deaf and Dumb) S/o.Arumugam, Represent by his son, Ganesh, M/A.21 Years, S/o.Muniyapillai, new colony (west...

Biju(Deaf and Dumb) vs K.Anbarasu

Court: Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1942 AGAINST THE AWARD IN OPMV 1186/2000 DATED 27-07-2005 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL...

Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. All India Deaf and Dumb Society

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2005)198CTR(Del)376; [2006]283ITR113(Delhi)

the loan in cash and again repaying the same in cash, as the Society runs a school for deaf and dumb children/persons. All the expenses are met from the donations or grants received from the government as

Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. All India Deaf and Dumb Society

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2006)198CTR(Del)376

the loan in cash and again repaying the same in cash, as the society runs a school for deaf and dumb children/persons. All the expenses are met from the donations or grants received from the Government as

The State of Gujarat Vs. One Deaf and Dumb Man

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1969CriLJ328

then sent to R. R. Hospital at Limdi. The Medical Officer certified that the accused appeared to be deaf and dumb. The learned Judicial Magistrate relied upon that certificate and found that the accused was deaf and

Rajinder Kumar Vs. All India Deaf and Dumb Society

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

A.P. Chowdhri, President: 1. All India Deaf and Dumb Society (Regd.), arrayed as opposite party in this complaint, appears to have been running a weekly

Emperor Vs. a Deaf and Dumb Accused

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1916)ILR40Bom598

Batchelor, J.1. In this case the accused, a deaf and dumb man, has been convicted of theft under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code, and the

Emperor Vs. a Deaf and Dumb

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1917Bom288; 37Ind.Cas.495

1. In this case the accused, a deaf and dumb man, has been convicted of theft under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code, and the

Emperor Vs. a Deaf and Dumb

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 37Ind.Cas.495

1. In this case the accused, a deaf and dumb man, has been convicted of theft under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code, and the