De - Judgment Search Results

The Market Committee Vs. Des Raj and Co.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2004)136PLR896

..... by sub judge 1st class jagraon in civil suit no 269 of 1977 m s des raj and co v market committee jagraon for payment of rs 24 000 to the .....

State of Punjab Vs. Des Raj and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2004P& H113

..... the extent of rs 2 000 against the appellant and respondent no 2 2 plaintiff des raj filed the instant suit against the state of punjab and the respondent no 2 .....

Gurcharan Singh Vs. Des Raj and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: I(2005)BC512; (2004)136PLR212

the matter is remanded to the trial court for fresh decision in accordance with law

Des Raj Vs. Bhim and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2004)137PLR621

..... agreement was extended upto 18 6 1980 and endorsement was in writing duly signed by des raj and bhim this has also been so mentioned by pw6 bhim who is the .....

Des Raj (Dead) Through Lrs. Vs. Kulwant Singh and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2003)135PLR601

..... that it was not the defendants who were tenant but kishan buttonwala shoe seller when des raj appeared as pw5 a perusal of the mortgage deed would show that the recital .....

Des Raj Vs. Raj Kumar

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2003)133PLR711

satish kumar mittal j 1 des raj petitioner who is the tenant has filed the instant revision petition against the order .....

Des Raj Alias Deso Vs. Financial Commissioner, Taxation and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2003)135PLR591

of this contention learned counsel for the petitioner cited a decision of the hon ble supreme court in m poornachandran v

Des Raj Verma Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2003)135PLR471

into the question of fact therefore in view of the denial by the respondents and in the absence of any material

Des Raj Vs. Vinod Kumar and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2003)134PLR327

had himself filed suit no 130 of 2001 titled as desh raj v vinod kumar in paragraph 2 of that suit

De-nocil Crop Protection Pvt. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

because there is a interval between the clearance between the depot and clearance from the factory and the seasonal factor which