Skip to content


De - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: de Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.075 seconds)
Mar 07 1966 (FN)

Sociedad De Mario Mercado E Hijos Vs. Puerto Rico

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-07-1966

..... e hijos v puerto rico 383 u s 412 1966 u s supreme court sociedad de mario mercado e hijos v puerto rico 383 u s 412 1966 383 u s ..... 412 sociedad de mario mercado e hijos v puerto rico appeal from the supreme court of puerto rico .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 30 1966 (HC)

Mohima Ranjan Roy and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-30-1966

Reported in: AIR1967Cal42,1967CriLJ45

..... was his duty to examine the prosecution witnesses who were examined before de novo the main reason is that in so far as the ..... that the accused persons really prayed before the learned magistrate that a de novo enquiry under chapter xviii should be embarked upon on these ..... we however do not consider that it purported to mean that a de novo enquiry should be made when a magistrate decides to commit .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 1966 (HC)

Rajalakshmi and ors. Vs. Minor Ramachandran and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-11-1966

Reported in: (1966)2MLJ420

..... it is submitted that section 11 of the act prohibits only a de facto guardian from disposing of or dealing with the property of ..... court he will therefore be a guardian in fact that is a de facto guardian so the interdiction under section 11 of the hindu ..... 1956 would certainly apply to the acts of arumugha padayachi as guardian de facto trevelyan in his law relating to minors recognises only three .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 1966 (FN)

United States Vs. Utah Construction and Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-06-1966

..... disputes clause and the administrative findings regarding the responsibility for the delays were subject to de novo determination in the court of claims the disputes clause limited the authority of ..... is therefore whether factual issues that have once been properly determined administratively may be retried de novo in subsequent breach of contract actions for relief that is unavailable under the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 06 1966 (HC)

D. Gobalousamy Vs. Union Territory of Pondicherry and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-06-1966

Reported in: AIR1968Mad298

..... a separate treaty vide union of india v manmull jain air1954cal615 during this period of de facto transfer pondicherry was administered by the government of india under a the foreign ..... governed by the decret already referred to but certain administrative exigencies arose particularly following the de jure transfer and in october 1963 of the extension of various indian enactments to pondicherry .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 1966 (HC)

Ranjit Kr. Banerjee Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-30-1966

Reported in: AIR1967Cal523,[1968]69ITR22(Cal)

..... the income of the partners of the unregistered firm 11 mr de made full use of the following observations of the supreme court ..... the second proviso thereto can also have no application 12 mr de however is faced with an insuperable difficulty on the facts in ..... a partner and not the unregistered firm itself that interpretation which mr de for the assessee suggests would really lead to a repeal of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 06 1966 (HC)

D. Gobalousamy Vs. the Union Territory of Pondicherry, by Its Lt. Gove ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-06-1966

Reported in: (1967)2MLJ85

..... a separate treaty vide union of india v manmul jain air1954cal615 during this period of de facto transfer pondicherry was administered by the government of india under i the foreign ..... governed by the decret already referred to but certain administrative exigencies arose particularly following the de jure transfer and in october 1963 of the extension of various indian enactments to pondicherry .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 18 1966 (HC)

Janab Haji Abdul Hamid Rowther and anr. Vs. Samsunnissa Begum

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-18-1966

Reported in: (1967)2MLJ195

..... muhammadan law any transfer of the minor s immovable property by a de facto guardian is wholly void till the passing of the hindu ..... minority and guardianship act of 1956 even the de facto guardian of a hindu minor could in certain circumstances alienate the ..... the indian limitation act seem to indicate that any sale by a de jure guardian must be prima facie presumed to be valid and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 1966 (HC)

Ali Mohammad Vs. Ramniwas and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Nov-30-1966

Reported in: AIR1967Raj258

..... and want of competence on the part of the minor and his de facto guardian to enter into any such transaction the courts below ..... distinction without any difference because the law is firmly settled that a de facto guardian of a muslim minor has no power to transfer ..... being his legal guardian and who may therefore be conveniently called a de facto guardian has no power to convey to another any right or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 23 1966 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Nawab of Rampur

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-23-1966

Reported in: AIR1966All440; [1966]62ITR1(All)

..... and the position of the states was in a fluid state no de facto or de jure recognition was given to the hyderabad state or to any ..... of paramountcy and the position of the states was unsettled and no de facto or de jure recognition had been given to them by the family of nations ..... the constitution or the federal law or the treaty mccain v city of des moines 1899 43 law ed 936 939 miller v hawies 5 com .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //