De - Judgment Search Results

De Vs. Hi Ramji Makwana

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)1SOT540(Mum.)

that assessee was a drug smuggler. During the course of investigation by the Narcotics Cell of the Police Department about his activities, it was gathered that he had purchased a bungalow No. 9, Trishul Complex, Sindhi Society,

De Vs. Hree Cement Ltd.

Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT Rajasthan

Reported in: (2003)133STC410Tribunal

cent with retrospective effect from August 6, 1988, the assessment orders (annexure 2 in each case) and the demand notices (annexure 3 in each case). Their particulars are as follows : On the establishment of the Tribunal,

income Tax Officer Vs. De

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2008)113CTR(Delhi)615

following ground: On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) has erred in deleting the penalty amounting to Rs. 11,82,242 imposed by the AO under Section 221(1) without giving any convincing reasons

Aurobnindo De Vs. Smt. Snati De and anr.

Court: Kolkata

The Court: The plaintiff is the elder son of the first defendant and the elder brother of the second defendant. The suit is for rendition of accounts relating to a

Mrs. Brigida De Souza Alias Brigida Miranda Vs. Julino De Souza

Court: Mumbai Goa

Appellant and Shri Lotlikar, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent. 2. The above Appeal challenges an Order and Decree dated 14.12.2004, whereby Matrimonial Petition filed by the Appellants came to be dismissed as no cause of action

Aivy De Souza Faria and Others Vs. Alvaro De Souza Faria, Through His ...

Court: Mumbai Goa

under: Inventory proceedings No. 19036/78/II were instituted in order to partition the inheritance of Amancio Sebastiao Aleixo Roque de Pilar de Souza and his wife Maria Josefina Aquavia Martinha Faria. These proceedings were initiated on 27/01/1978. Their

Shri Victor De Graca Pinto and Another Vs. Smt. Lourdes De Graca Pinto ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1999(3)ALLMR39; 1999(3)BomCR441; (1999)1BOMLR704

ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. After obtaining a decree, the problem of the decree-holders is execution of the Decree. All sorts of possible objections are raised in

Aditya Kumar De Chowdhury Vs. Narayandas De Chowdhury

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1971Cal65,75CWN439

house. When disputes had arisen between them regarding enjoyment of the joint properties, one of them, namely, Narayandas De Chowdbury instituted a suit in the Court of Munsil at Kama over disputes regarding some of the joint

Hakim MartIn De Silva Vs. MartIn De Silva Ii and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1957Raj275

Bapna, J. 1. The present matter relates to the determination of proper court-fees in an appeal under section 54 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition. Act from the decision

Benoy Krishna De and ors. Vs. Ashutosh De and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1954Cal389,58CWN78

Chakravartti, C.J.1. This is an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against a judgment and decree of Rama Prasad Mookerjee J. passed in Second Appeal No. 1451 of 1946 which was heard along with