Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Dated - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 01 2013

Date of Decision : 1.8.2013 Vs. Date of Decision : 1.8.2013

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-01-2013

1992 for dictating this order. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash an order dated 17.8.1992 (P-2) passed by respondent No.2 and to stay the operation and implementation of the impugned order. Kumar


Jan 17 2013

Date of Decision: January 17 2013 Vs. Date of Decision: January 17, 20 ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-17-2013

Judgment should be reported in the . Digest RITU BAHRI, J.The instant criminal appeal is directed against judgment dated 06.08.2007 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari convicting Ashok Kumar-appellant under Section 302 IPC and the order dated


Feb 11 2013

Date of Decision: February 11 2013 Vs. Date of Decision: February 11, ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-11-2013

Judgment should be reported in the Digest RITU BAHRI, J. The instant criminal appeal is directed against judgment dated 07.08.2008 passed by Sessions Judge, Chandigarh convicting and sentencing the appellant for life as follows: Offence RI Fine


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 10 2013

Date of Decision: January 10 2013 Vs. Date of Decision: January 10, 20 ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-10-2013

on 29.06.2012 (P-2 Colly.).A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner allegedly purchased the goods vide invoice dated 25.06.2012. The consignment was intercepted by SHO Rajpura, on 29.06.2012. An FIR No.164 for the offence under Sections


Mar 31 2014

Date of Decision: March 31 2014 Vs. Date of Decision: March 31, 2014

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-31-2014

Amrika during the pendency of appeal. Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide judgment of conviction dated 05.03.2014 and order of sentence dated 06.03.2014, passed in case FIR No.79 dated 12.04.2013, held the applicants-appellants guilty


Aug 02 2014

Date of Decision: 02.08.2014 Vs. Date of Decision: 02.08.2014

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-02-2014

Hooda, Advocate For the appellant HARINDER SINGH SIDHU,J This petition has been filed praying for quashing of notification dated 19.01.2012 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’) and notification under Section


Apr 08 1976

Laxmibai Sadashiv Date and ors. Vs. Ganesh Shankar Date and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-08-1976

Reported in: AIR1977Bom350; (1977)79BOMLR234

Kantawaia, C.J. 1. The Division Bench consisting of Deshmukh and Sapre, JJ. by its judgment and order dated 14th/15th July 1975 has referred the following question for determination by the Full Bench;--'When an alienation like the


Apr 04 1910

Narayan Shridhar Date Vs. Pandurang Bapuji Date

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-04-1910

Reported in: (1910)12BOMLR471

Basil Scott, Kt., C.J.1. The only question that we have to decide in this case is whether the certificate of the Administrator-General granted to the plaintiff entitles him to sue for possession of the plaint property...


Mar 26 2025

Lion Dates Impex Private Limited Vs Asif Traders

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-26-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYLion Dates Impex Private Limited, No.40, Sterling Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034., Represented by its Managing Director, Ms.P.Anitha. ... Applicant/Plaintiff


Feb 19 2008

Lion Dates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Controller, Legal Metrology (Weights and Meas ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-19-2008

Reported in: AIR2008AP188; 2008(3)ALT265; 2009(234)ELT434(AP)

but he did not agree with the said contention and hence the writ petition to quash the proceedings dated 10.01.2003 of the 2nd respondent.3. On behalf of the respondents the in charge Regional Deputy Controller (Head Quarters),


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial