Dangerous - Judgment Search Results

Ashish @ Danger Vs. State

Court: Delhi

..... 03 2013 judgment pronounced on 08 05 2013 1 criminal appeal no 496 2011 ashish danger through mr sumeet dhclsc appellant verma advocate versus state through 2 respondent mr sanjay lao .....

Bhucha Dhana Danger and ors. Vs. Jiviben Madeva Lukhel and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1992ACJ1093; (1992)2GLR377

r k abichandani j 1 the petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 8th october 1991 passed by the motor...

Md. Ashanullah Vs. Md. Abdul Nessim @ Danger Bhaity and anr.

Court: Guwahati

i a ansari j 1 this revision is directed against the order dated 28 6 2002 passed in criminal appeal...

Dennis Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... our attempt to deal with this domestic problem are not an external danger they represent a danger within ourselves a danger that something may occur in our own minds and souls which will ..... orderly discussion and persuasion at appropriate time and place must have clear support in public danger actual or impending only the gravest abuses endangering paramount interests give occasion for permissible .....

Foucha Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... but unacknowledged corollarythe vast majority of states do not allow confinement based on dangerousness alone second justice thomas description of these state statutes also is importantly incomplete ..... courts should pay particular deference to reasonable legislative judgments about the relationship between dangerous behavior and mental illness jones supra at 365 n 13 louisiana evidently has .....

Kelly Vs. South Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as to whether the state somehow show ed the defendant s future dangerousness argue d future dangerousness or put future dangerousness in issue id at 176 177 given such an imprecise standard it ..... simmons anyhow app 245 the defense responded that the state ha d already raised future dangerousness through presentation of sentencing phase evidence calling correctional officers to testify to an escape .....

Demore Vs. Kim

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1226 c would ultimately be deported and discounting the second protecting the public from dangerous criminal aliens on the grounds that the aggravated felony classification triggering respondent s ..... determinations had occurred rather they contended that the district director s individual findings of dangerousness were unsupported by sufficient reliable evidence see id at 549 550 black j dissenting .....

Baker (Respondent) Vs. Quantum Clothing Group Limited (Appellants) and ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... injury is foreseeable as a possibility is not necessarily sufficient to make the machinery dangerous it is dangerous only if the risk of injury is sufficiently likely to make it more than ..... applies at all whether rightly or wrongly accordingly the fact that the courts have interpreted dangerous under reference to reasonable foreseeability does not mean that necessarily the same criteria should apply .....

Organon (India) Ltd. (Now Known as Infar (India) Ltd. and Another Vs. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1994SC2489; JT1994(4)SC438; 1994(3)SCALE421; 1995Supp(1)SCC53; [1994]Supp2SCR50

..... meaning bringing into or taking out of state otherwise than across any customs frontiers the dangerous drugs act deals with import into india and export from india across customs frontiers evidently ..... rules have also been framed by the central government under section 7 of the dangerous drugs act called dangerous drugs import export and transshipment rules 1957 rule 2 2 defines narcotics commissioner .....

A.C. Billings and Sons Limited Vs. Riden

Court: House of Lords

..... appellants were not responsible for any damage arising from this dangerous condition 2 the duty resting on the contractor was confined ..... trespasser might raise difficult questions in certain circumstances or certain dangers but nothing of that sort is present in this case ..... negligence but it is said the plaintiff knew of the danger before the contributory negligence act 1945 a plaintiff guilty of .....