Daddy - Judgment Search Results

Dinaji and ors. Vs. Daddi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1153; JT1989(4)SC434; 1990MPLJ1(SC); 1989(2)SCALE1178; (1990)1SCC1; [1989]Supp2SCR144

G.L. Oza and; M. Fathima Beevi, JJ.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated December 13, 1971 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Second Appeal No. 617 of 1989, wherein the learned Judge...

M/s Daddys Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Manisha Bhargava

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA EXTRA-ORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTION Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.1240 of 2021 M/s Daddy’s Builders Pvt. Ltd. & Another …Petitioners Versus Manisha Bhargava and Another …Respondents ORDER M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved

Raj Narayan @ Daddi Vs. the State of M.P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

PRADESH AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.184 OF1998APPELLANT : Raj Narayan @ Daddi Chaturvedi S/o Ram Pratap Chaturvedi @ Bolai, Age :35. years, R/o Village Mangawani, P.S. : Indwar, District Shahdol

Daddi Baisa Vs. the State of M.P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Tiwari, Govt. Advocate for respondent /State. Judgment Reserved on :26. 07.13 Judgment Delivered on :27. 09.13 JUDGMENT Appellant Daddi Baiga has filed this appeal under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 being aggrieved by the judgment

Daddy S. Mazda and ors. Vs. K.R. Irani

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1977]47CompCas39(Cal),78CWN872

the cheques by which moneys have been withdrawn from the bank are suspected to have been signed by Daddy Shappor Mazda in the name of K. R. Irani and that the receipt dated January 28, 1969, produced

M/S Daddys Developers and Builders Vs. Sri S. Kannan

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

SURESH CHANDRA, MEMBER Challenge in this revision petition is to the order dated 19.09.2011 passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore (State Commission for short). By its order, the State Commission dismissed the...

Soul Ramokata Daddy Motsisi Vs. the State

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

he asked the complainant again what they had been doing inside the house. The complainant informed him that Daddy had intercourse with her. 5. He stated that when he confronted the complainant he was angry and at

The Property Company (P) Ltd. versus Rohinten Daddy Mazda

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2026] 1 S.C.R. 227

[2026] 1 S.C.R. 227 : 2026 INSC 33 The Property Company (P) Ltd. v. Rohinten Daddy Mazda (Civil Appeal No. 92 of 2026) 07 January 2026 [J.B. Pardiwala* and R. Mahadevan, JJ.]Issue for ConsiderationIssue

Dina Ji and Others Vs. Daddi and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1153a; II(1990)DMC296

1. This appeal arises out of the Judgment dated 13.12.1971 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Second Appeal No. 617/89, wherein the learned Judge of the High Court dismissed the Second Appeal filed by...

The Property Company Ltd. Vs. Rohinten Daddy Mazda

Court: Kolkata

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN ACO No.91 of 2016 APO No.222 of 2016 THE PROPERTY COMPANY LTD.versus ROHINTEN DADDY MAZDA For the Petitioner : Mr.Jishnu Saha, Sr.Adv., Mr.Sanjib Kumar Mal, Adv., Mr.Dibanath Dey, Adv.For the Respondent :