Dad - Judgment Search Results
M.I.Dads vs the State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-16-2023
EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD 678 001. 5 ELSAMMA JOHN, THALAPPILLY HOUSE, EAST VILLAGE, PUTHUKODE, PALAKAKD 678 687. 6 M.I. DADS, H.S.A. PHYSICAL SCIENCE, SARVAJANA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PUTHUKODE, PALAKKAD 678 687. 7 ADDL R7, M.K.INDIRA, AGED 55 YEARS
Ali Dad Khan and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Moradabad ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-09-2002
Reported in: 2002(2)AWC1560
11 of the writ petition that after remand from High Court, the statement of petitioner No. 1 All Dad Khan was recorded on oath before the Deputy Director of Consolidation in which petitioner No. 1 has specifically
Dad Khan Khudad Khan Vs. Abdul Samad Peeru Bakhsh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-1959
Reported in: AIR1960MP65
Matched in: Parties Dad Khan Khudad Khan Vs. Abdul Samad Peeru Bakhsh
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Fazal Dad Alias Sardar Khan Fateh Ali Vs. the State of M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-13-1962
Reported in: AIR1964MP272; 1965MPLJ329
ORDER1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Fazaldad s/o Sardarkhan challenges the validity of the order dated 4-4-1960 passed by the State Government under Sub-clause (c) of Sub-section (2)...
Rajkumar Dad and Alumayer India Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-30-2006
Matched in: Parties Rajkumar Dad and Alumayer India Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Mohammad Raziq-dad Khan Vs. Haji Mohammad Zafaryab Khan and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-10-1929
Reported in: AIR1930All168
Matched in: Parties Mohammad Raziq-dad Khan Vs. Haji Mohammad Zafaryab Khan and ors.
Syed Dad Ali Vs. JamiruddIn Sheikh and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-30-1934
Reported in: AIR1934Cal715
Matched in: Parties Syed Dad Ali Vs. JamiruddIn Sheikh and ors.
Mir Dad Khan and anr. Vs. Ramzan Khan and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-09-1918
Reported in: AIR1918All86; 44Ind.Cas.988
J.1. The suit out of which this first appeal arises is based upon the following state of facts:Mir Dad Khan and others were the owners of proprietary rights in a certain Mahal. Appurtenant to those proprietary-rights was
Sayada Begum vs.qaisar Dad Khan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2018
Mr. Raman Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. F. Hasan and Mr. Farooq Chaudhry, Advs. Versus ..... Respondent QAISAR DAD KHAN Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This second appeal impugns
Mst. Noor Jahan Begum Vs. Muftkhar Dad Khan and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-21-1969
Reported in: AIR1970All170
Rafi-ul-Qadar. Rafi-ul-Qadar had two wives, of whom the appellant, Noor Jehan Begum, is one. The first respondent, Muftkhar Dad Khan, is a son by the other wife.3. According to the appellant, on September 5, 1916 Rafi Ullah
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free