Cuttingly - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Cutting

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. Cutting - 70 U.S. 441 (1865) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Cutting, 70 U.S. 3 Wall. 441 441 (1865) United States v. Cutting 70 U.S. (3 Wall.) 441 ON ERROR TO THE...

Carter's Heirs Vs. Cutting

Court: US Supreme Court

Carter's Heirs v. Cutting - 12 U.S. 251 (1814) U.S. Supreme Court Carter's Heirs v. Cutting, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 251 251 (1814) Carter's Heirs v. Cutting, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 251 (1814) 12 U.S. (8...

Cutting Edge Digital Pvt. Ltd vs Atsl Entertainment Pvt. Ltd

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 17.02.2026 + ARB.P. 2078/2025 CUTTING EDGE DIGITAL PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Apoorva Thakral, Ms. Ankita Gulliya and Ms. Sudikha, Advocates.versusATSL ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD...

Shri Srinivasa Cut Pieces Cloth Shop and Mr. Bommanna Krishnamurthy Ra ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005BomCR(Cri)465

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. B.R. Patil, learned Public Prosecutor, waives service for respondents No.1-State. Mr Dhanuka, learned counsel, waives service for respondent No. 2-complainant Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel...

Sciaky Wire Cut Pvt. Ltd. Co. and ors. Vs. Sudhir Vishnu Dhotre and or ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2008)IILLJ41Bom; 2007(6)MhLj521

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. Writ Petition No. 5493 of 1996 has been filed by the employer in which the order of the Industrial Court dated 9-8-1996 in revision application (ULP) No. 49 of 1996 is challenged to...

Dagger Die Cutting Rep. by Its Sole Proprietrix Mrs. Rukhsana Deshpand ...

Court: Chennai

ORDERM. Jeyapaul, J.1. The petitioner M/s. Dagger Die Cutting was started in the year 1993. It is engaged in manufacturing and selling of Leather Die Cutting Knives. The petitioner is registered as a small scale industry....

Cm Cutting Memorial Inter College and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Ot ...

Court: Allahabad

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order impugned dated 23.03.2010, by which petitioners-Committee of Management has been recognized and a direction to that effect has...

Rashtriya Hair Cutting Saloon Vs. the Maharashtra Kamgar Sabha and ors ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1991(3)BomCR408; (1991)93BOMLR165; [1991(62)FLR795]; (1994)IIILLJ1086Bom

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner-Employer has impugned part of the Award dated 24th April, 1987, made by Shri S.A. Patil, Member, Industrial Tribunal, Maharashtra...

Ganga Cut Piece Centre Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [1996]219ITR201(MP)

A.R. Tiwari, J.1. The applicant (Messrs. Ganga Cut-piece Centre, Dewas), has filed this application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act').2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the...

Ganga Cut Piece Centre Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [1997]225ITR839(MP)

A.R. Tiwari, J. 1. The applicant-assessee has filed this application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act').2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the applicant is a partnership...