Cutlery - Judgment Search Results
Hind Cutlery House Vs. Malik Bartan Bhandar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2003
Reported in: 2003IIAD(Delhi)266; 103(2003)DLT161; 2003(26)PTC344(Del); [2004]50SCL349(Delhi)
of two partners viz. Shri Pradeep Kumar Rastogi and Shri Pramod Kumar Rastogi trading jointly as M/s. Hind Cutlery House at Amroha Gate, Moradabad (U.P.).2. Since the year 1979, the plaintiff's firm has been carrying on the
Kishco Cutlery Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-23-1983
Reported in: 1984(15)ELT367(Bom)
the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 and was carrying on business as manufacturers and dealers in cutlery. The said Kumar Bros. (India) Pvt. Ltd. carried on business in the name and style of Kishco Cutlery
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Himalaya Cutlery Works
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-05-2005
Reported in: (2006)201CTR(All)167; [2006]287ITR485(All)
Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Himalaya Cutlery Works
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Sales Tax, Gujarat State Vs. India Cutlery Stores, Sur ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-07-1970
Reported in: [1971]27STC548(Guj)
be briefly stated : The assessee is a firm carrying on business as a dealer in sewing thread, cutlery, fireworks, Bengal light matches, paper caps etc. The assessee was assessed to sales tax for the period Kartak
M/S United Cutlery Works Vs. Delhi State Industrial Development
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-06-2011
1. The Petitioner, M/s United Cutlery Works („UCW), seeks a mandamus to the Respondent, Delhi State Industrial Development Corporation Limited („DSIDC), to inter alia
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free