Custodian - Judgment Search Results

Custodian Vs. Member, Special Tribunal and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

and others was allowed and the order of the Special Tribunal dated 14-9-1990 remanding the case to the Custodian for fresh enquiry, was quashed. 2. On the institution of the appeal, there was divergence of opinion between

AshwIn S. Mehta and anr. Vs. Custodian and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC795; 2006(3)BomCR329; [2006]130CompCas197(SC); (2006)2CompLJ193(SC); [2006(2)JCR255(SC)]; JT2006(1)SC229; (2006)2MLJ220(SC); 2006(1)SCALE33; (2006)2SCC385; [2006]6

for matters connected therewith. In terms of the provisions of the Act, along with late Harshad Mehta, the Custodian had notified 29 entities in terms of Section 3 of the Act, comprising three of his younger brothers,

Harshad Shantilal Mehta Vs. Custodian and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998(2)ALD(Cri)302; 1998LC1(SC); JT1998(4)SC323; 1998(2)SCALE394

Matched in: Parties Harshad Shantilal Mehta Vs. Custodian and ors.

Harshad Shantilal Mehta Vs. Custodian and ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998VAD(SC)82; AIR1998SC2291; 1998(3)ALLMR(SC)659; II(1999)BC418(SC); [1998]92CompCas936(SC); [1998]231ITR871(SC); JT1998(4)SC23; RLW1998(2)SC353; 1998(3)SCALE556; (1998)5S

to the interpretation of Section 11 of the Act.Civil Appeal No. 5225 of 1995 is filed by the Custodian appointed under the provisions of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992

Pallav Sheth Vs. Custodian and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC2763; 2001(2)ALD(Cri)464; 2001(49)BLJR1920; [2001]107CompCas76(SC); (2001)4CompLJ161(SC); 2001CriLJ4175; (2002)2GLR860; JT2001(6)SC330; 2001MPLJ124(SC); 2001(5)SCA; (2001) 7 SCC 549

Court Act. As a result thereof, all properties belonging to the said notified party stood automatically attached.3. The Custodian appointed under the Special Court Act filed Misc. Application No. 193 of 1993 and sought a decree for

Premanand R. Shenoy Vs. Custodian and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2009]152CompCas551(SC); JT2009(9)SC339; 2009(8)SCALE674; [2009]92SCL361(SC):2009AIRSCW6371:2009(4)LHSC2494

(hereinafter referred to as `the Act') whereby and whereunder the Special Court allowed the application filed by the Custodian (respondent No. 1 herein) thereby directing the appellant to pay to the Custodian an amount of Rs. 2,83,192/-

B.O.i. Finance Ltd. Vs. Custodian and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC1952; 1997(4)ALLMR(SC)450; [1997]89CompCas74(SC); JT1997(4)SC15; 1996(5)SCALE17; (1997)10SCC488; [1997]3SCR51

to transactions in securities and disposal of properties attached. It also provides for appointment of one or more Custodians for attaching the property of the offenders with a view to prevent diversion of such properties by the

C. Mackertich Ltd. Vs. Custodian

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [2002]108CompCas811(Cal)

case of the petitioner is that a notification dated 20-11-2001, was issued by the Mr. D.K. Tyagi, the Custodian appointed under Section 3(1) of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992

C. Mackertich Ltd. Vs. Custodian

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [2003]46SCL220(Cal)

and 10-12-2001 by filing the present writ petition. The notification dated 20-11-2001 was issued by Mr. D.K. Tyagi, Custodian appointed under Section 3(1) of the Act of 1992 and by that notification one Sri Ajay Kayan, figured

The Divl. Controller Chief Custodian of Internal Insurance Fund, Insur ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2010ACJ438:AIR2009NOC611(D.B):2009(1)KCCR182:2009(1)AIRKarR137

Matched in: Parties The Divl. Controller Chief Custodian of Internal Insurance Fund, Insurer and Owner of Ksrts Bus Bearing No. Ka-09/F 1506 R/by Its Chief Law Officer Ksrtc Vs. K.C. Roopa W/O Late Shivanna and ors.