Currency - Judgment Search Results
Currency Note Press Vs. n.n.sardesai .
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-20-2018
Ministry of Finance, Government of India and had been specifically incorporated to take on the work of printing currency notes and minting of coins along with 7 other units. Their printing press is at Nashik(Maharashtra). The respondents
Master Currency (Pty) Limited Vs. the Commissioner for the South Afric ...
Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
costs. JUDGMENT Malan JA (Leach JA, Southwood, Schoeman and Van der Merwe AJJA concurring): [1] The appellant, Master Currency (Pty) Ltd, appeals against the dismissal by the Johannesburg Tax Court (Victor J) of its appeal against the
India Security Press Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Currency Note Press and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-07-1987
Reported in: (1993)IIILLJ58Bom
Sawant, J.1. The question that falls to be considered in the present petition is whether the change effected in the hours of work is illegal.2. The Petitioners are a trade union representing the workmen in the...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Currency Investment Co. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-06-1999
Reported in: (2000)158CTR(Cal)361,[2000]241ITR494(Cal)
Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Currency Investment Co. Ltd.
United States Vs. ,850 in Currency
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-23-1983
United States v. ,850 in Currency - 461 U.S. 555 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. $8,850 in Currency, 461 U.S. 555 (1983)
Peer Mohammed and S. Raju Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2003
Reported in: 2004CriLJ45
Maistry Street, at Ennore Road junction, the second accused having given a sum of Rs. 20,000/- as original currency to the first accused, the second accused obtained counterfeit notes for Rs. 50,000/- of Rs. 100/- denomination knowingly
J. Murugesan and Another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The D ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-03-2016
Matched in: Parties J. Murugesan and Another Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Counterfeit Currency Wing, Crime Branch CID, Chennai
In Re: Section 25, Paper Currency Act (10 of 1923)
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-24-1928
Reported in: AIR1928All371
follows:Whether a promissory note made payable to bearer on demand offends (against) the provisions of Section 25, Paper Currency Act No. 10 of 1923.Is such a promissory note void and inadmissible in evidence and cannot be the
United States Vs. U.S. CoIn and Currency
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-05-1971
United States v. U.S. Coin & Currency - 401 U.S. 715 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. U.S. Coin & Currency, 401 U.S. 715
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free