Crompton V Belknap - Judgment Search Results
Reedy Vs. Scott
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1874
Black 282. [ Footnote 2 ] Prouty v. Ruggles, 16 Pet. 336; Vance v. Campbell, 1 Black 427; Crompton v. Belknap Mills, 3 Fisher 536. [ Footnote 3 ] Moffitt v. Garr, 1 Black 273; Curtis on Patents §§
Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. Contra ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-27-1991
Reported in: ILR1991KAR3679; 1992(1)KarLJ477
proposition advanced by Mr. Subba Rao is that of Madras High Court rendered in WORKMEN OF BEST & CROMPTON v. THE MANAGEMENT, 1985-1 LLJ 492. In the said case the Labour Court had given a finding that the
Tomlinson and Others Vs. Birmingham City Council
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-17-2010
right to receive a social security payment of any kind is an indication to the contrary. 47. In Crompton v United Kingdom, application no 42509/05, 27 October 2009, BAILII: [2009] ECHR 1659, the applicant who had joined the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
indo Rama Synthetics (i) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2009
Reported in: (2010)228CTR(Del)278
Praga Tools Ltd. : (1985) 49 CTR (AP) 269 : (1986) 157 ITR 282 (AP) and CIT v. Crompton Engineering Co. Ltd. : (2000) 242 ITR 317 (Mad). Therefore, this question has also to be answered in
Reliance Generators Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-24-2009
Reported in: (2009)26VST507(Mad)
for consideration before a Division Bench of this Court in the judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Crompton Engineering Co. (Madras) Limited [1977] 39 STC 260 and the Division Bench has observed as follows : (page
Universal Ferro and Allied Chemicals Limited Vs. Member, Industrial Co ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-17-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALLMR191; 2002(3)BomCR650; [2002(94)FLR554]
by special tribunals at interlocutory stages and on preliminary issues.'7. In the case of Rajiv Bhalchandra Gundewar v. Crompton Greaves Ltd., reported in 2000 (1) CLR 818 it was observed by this Court as follows :'So far
Standard Batteries Ltd. Vs. Casings (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-16-1978
Reported in: (1980)82BOMLR355
judgement of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court in the case of Electrical Mfg. Co. v. Crompton Engg, Co. : AIR1974Mad261 , wherein the Court held, in the circumstances of that case, which I shall
Ram Rattan Bhartia Vs. Food Corporation of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-1977
Reported in: AIR1978Delhi183; 1978RLR177
basis of the judgment of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court in Electrical . Calcutta v. Crompton Engineering Co. (Madras) Ltd., Madras, : AIR1974Mad261 . In that case the defendant by an agreement dated l1th
Canara Bank Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-11-1961
Reported in: ILR1962KAR270; [1963]47ITR529(KAR); [1963]47ITR529(Karn)
how the assessability of a profit should be determined is what was explained in Reynolds and Gibson v. Crompton. 41. In that case, there was a sale of cotton in the year 1920 by a firm to
Sri Rajah Rao Venkatakumara Mahipathi Surya Rao Bahadur Garu, the Maha ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-1931
Reported in: AIR1931Mad626; (1931)61MLJ111
of the mortgaged properties, has the right to ask for the appointment of a receiver : In re Crompton & Co., Ltd. Player v. Crompton & Co., Ltd. (1914) 1 Ch. 954 Warrington, J., observes at page
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free