Crocodility - Judgment Search Results

Lacoste vs Crocodile International Pte. Ltd. & Anr.

Court: Delhi

and Analysis 425.1 Scope of Review 5.2 Issue No. 1: Whether the use of the impugned mark by Crocodile International amounts to infringement of the copyright of Lacoste? 5.3 Issue No. 2: Whether the Agreements dated 17.06.1983

Crocodile International Pte. Ltd. vs La Chemise Lacoste and Anr

Court: Delhi

and Analysis 425.1 Scope of Review 5.2 Issue No. 1: Whether the use of the impugned mark by Crocodile International amounts to infringement of the copyright of Lacoste? 5.3 Issue No. 2: Whether the Agreements dated 17.06.1983

Crocodile Int. Pte Ltd. and anr. Vs. Lacoste S.A. and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2008(100)DRJ547

are engaged in a legal fight over the trademark and copyright in what the plaintiff has described as Crocodile Device, in which the plaintiff-respondent claims exclusive ownership. It took the parties nearly four years of long and

Crocodile (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

1. The appellants are manufacturers of ready made garments. During the material period, they sent grey cotton fabrics to job-worker for dyeing, which dispatch discharged was under Rule 12 13 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002....

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Crocodile I Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Chennai

K.B.K.VASUKI C.M.A.No.636 of 2008 The Commissioner of Central Excise No.1, Foulkes Compound Anaimedu Salem .. Appellant Vs.1. M/s. Crocodile (I) Pvt. Ltd No.2, FCI Complex Karamadai 2. Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Southern Regional Bench,