Criminal Narcotics - Judgment Search Results

ismail Adam Mitha Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2005)2GLR1813

Matched in: Advocate Harijindar Singh, Adv. for; Ramnandan Singh, Adv. in Criminal Appeal No. 133 of 2000 and; I.M. Pandya, APP in Criminal Appeal No. 133 of 2000 and; Harijindar Singh, Adv. for;

Mcdonald Vs. Chicago

Court: US Supreme Court

is distinctively American.” Roper , supra , at 624 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (citing Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents , 403 U. S. 388 , 415 (1971) (Burger, C. J., dissenting) (noting that exclusionary rule was … which was consolidated with two related actions, alleging that the City’s handgun ban has left them vulnerable to criminals. They sought a declaration that the ban and several related City ordinances violate the Second and Fourteenth Amendments.

State of Orissa Vs. Sitansu Sekhar Kanungo

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2002(8)SC292

in a manner appropriate without any interference from the apex court.10. The appeal, therefore, fails and is dismissed. Criminal - Narcotics - Seizure of brown sugar/heroin - Non production of malkhana register - Seizure list carrying particulars

State of Haryana Vs. Vidhya Dhar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1208; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)10; (2002)2CALLT45(SC); (SCSuppl)2002(2)CHN147; 2002(2)Crimes80(SC); 2002(80)ECC246; JT2002(2)SC361; 2002(2)SCALE386; (2002)3SCC296; [2002]2SC

appeal and affirm the conviction and sentence of the respondent as recovered by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhiwani. Criminal - Narcotics - Recovery of opium from the possession of respondent successfully proved by the prosecution and no

State of Punjab Vs. Balkar Singh and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2004CriLJ3839; 2004(93)ECC37; 2004(3)SCALE479; (2004)3SCC582

We do not find any infirmity in the judgment passed by the High Court.4. The appeal is dismissed. Criminal - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 15 and 50 - Appeal against acquittal - Recovery … not find any infirmity in the judgment passed by the High Court.4. The appeal is dismissed. Criminal - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 15 and 50 - Appeal against acquittal - Recovery of 100

Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Ghashiram Kanhyalal Solanki and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2003(85)ECC721

any observation made in this order shall not prejudice the case of the accused on merits in trial. Criminal - Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Section 8, 21, 25, 27, 27A, 29 - Huge quantity

State of Orissa Vs. P. Simanchal Patra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2002(2)ALD(Cri)472; 2002(83)ECC1; JT2002(Suppl1)SC27; 2002(2)LC1238(SC)

the learned trial judge stand restored. The respondent be taken into custody to serve out the sentence forthwith. Criminal - Narcotics - Power of entry, search seizure and arrest without warrant - Reason to believe - Requirement

T.T. Haneefa Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2004CriLJ2853; 2004(94)ECC199; JT2004(5)SC383; 2004(2)KLT1022(SC); 2004(5)SCALE754; (2004)5SCC128

the special Judge to take appropriate steps to arrest the appellant to undergo remaining part of the sentence. Criminal - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 21, 41, 42, 43 and 50 - Mandatory provisions … path and PW-1 questioned him and told that he suspected that the appellant must have been carrying some narcotic drug. PW-1 told the appellant that he has got right to demand the presence of a Magistrate when

S. Jeevanantham Vs. the State Through Inspector of Police, Tn

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2004(1)ALD(Cri)1015; 2004CriLJ3834; 2004(94)ECC130; 2004(5)SCALE780; (2004)5SCC230

also justified in confirming the conviction and sentence. These appeals are without any merit and are accordingly dismissing. Criminal - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 8(C), 20 and 50 - Recovery of Hashish from … 3(c) read with Section 20(b)(2) of the NDPS Act. PW-7 the Sub-Inspector, Thirumangalam Police Station got information that narcotic drug was being sold at some places and he recorded information and sent the same to the superior

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Pawan Kumar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2004CriLJ4614; 2004(96)ECC337; JT2004(8)SC190; 2004(3)KLT660(SC); 2004(8)SCALE238; (2004)7SCC735

been breached. The judgment of the High Court does not warrant any interference. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Criminal - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 8, 9, 10, 50(1) , 76 - … national, who was leaving India for Lagos was first asked at the airport if he was carrying any narcotics or other contraband goods and on his refusal, his luggage was checked. Nothing incriminating was found from the