Cpc 1908 Section 151 - Judgment Search Results

Y. Prabhakara Reddy Vs. K. Pramod Kumar Reddy and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh

wherein the Court below dismissed the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order 18 Rule 3-A read with Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (for short, C.P.C.) seeking the Court below to eschew the evidence of … appearing through the same counsel and their defence is the same. As per Rule 3-A of Order 18 CPC, if a party wishes to appear as a witness, he has to examine himself before any other witness

XXX vs. Yyy

Court: Mumbai

title, a liberty was granted to the Respondent to take recourse Rule 34 of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short "the said Code"). 5. We must note here that the present Petition … and irretrievably broken down and therefore, a decree of divorce deserves to be passed. He urged that under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908, there are abundant powers vesting in the matrimonial Court to do substantial

M/s. Jyothy Laboratories Limited Vs. The Appellate Authority, Chennai ...

Court: Chennai

the second respondent, being an IA filed under Order 16 Rule 6 and Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. 3. The petitioner has further submitted that in May 2011, the petitioner acquired a majority stake in … in TSE-IIA 3/2013, filed by the second respondent, being an IA filed under Order 16 Rule 6 and Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908. 3. The petitioner has further submitted that in May 2011, the petitioner acquired

Kiocl (Formerly Kudremukh Iron Ore Company Limited), Bangalore Vs. Uni ...

Court: Karnataka

statement of objections to the said application. However, the respondent herein filed another application under Section 151 of CPC on 16-11-2007 as per Annexure-U (numbered as I.A.2) to return the original award dated 31-5-2007 for having it … matter is pending before the concerned Court. 2. During the interregnum, the petitioner herein filed an application under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 before the court below to call for the original award which is

Express Newspapers Ltd. Vs. Indian Express Newspapers (Bom) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1997(40)DRJ311

Lokeshwar Prasad, J.(1) This Order will dispose of defendant's application, filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code'), seeking modification of order dated the 14th December, … Lokeshwar Prasad, J.(1) This Order will dispose of defendant's application, filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code'), seeking modification of order dated

Goldmine Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Nazareth Joseph Perriera and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)104BOMLR908a

the due administration of justice the Court is not powerless to exercise its jurisdiction. Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is intended to protect and safeguard the power of the Court to ensure that … by their conduct affected the due administration of justice the Court is not powerless to exercise its jurisdiction. Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is intended to protect and safeguard the power of the Court

Sk. Illias Vs. Co-operative for American Relief Everywhere, India and ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR2007Ori9

to refute claims made by petitioner - Hence, striking down of point under Order 6 Rule 16 of CPC of said allegations cannot be said as illegal - Petition accordingly dismissed - LABOUR & SERVICES Pay Scale:[Tarun … 1990 Orissa 107. This Court in the aforesaid case held that the Court under its inherent power under Section 151 can order for expunction of unnecessary and scandalous matters from any petitions or affidavits whatsoever even if they … - Facts - Order 6 Rule 16 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908(CPC) - Petitioner was employee under opposite party no.1 - Charges of misconduct

Hasmukhrai Khelshanker Thaker. Vs. Indiana Ophthelmic.

Court: Gujarat

as to cost. [Markandey Katju ; Gyan Sudha Misra, JJ.] - Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C.) 1908 - Section 151 - Saving of inherent powers of Court -- This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and … 1. The petitioner/original plaintiff has filed this Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, challenging the order passed by the learned Extra Assistant Judge, Surendranagar in Civil Misc. Appeal

Balwinder Kumar Vs. Rajinder Kumar and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2005P& H246; (2005)140PLR475

Order 39 Rules 1, 2 and 2(A) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) - Predecessor-in-interest of respondents Nos. 1 to 3 filed appeal before … by trial Court - In appeal, respondents also moved application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC - While admitting appeal, Appellate Court passed interim order restraining petitioner, from alienating suit land till further orders … court. In the appeal, he also moved an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code. While admitting the appeal on 5.2.1993, the appellate court passed an interim order restraining the

Patel Baldevbhai Jivabhai. Vs. Sundarpur Gram Panchayat Through Sarpan ...

Court: Gujarat

as to costs. [Markandey Katju ; Gyan Sudha Misra, JJ.] - Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C.) 1908 - Section 151 - Saving of inherent powers of Court -- This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and … the evidence has to fulfill the conditions as provided in sub-rule (1) of Rule 27 Order 41 of CPC. In the present case, the petitioner had not produced any evidence or that the trial Court has refused