Skip to content


Covering - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: covering Page 1 of about 7 results (0.024 seconds)
May 23 2003 (TRI)

Flora Wall Coverings Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC677

was exported was not silk wall coverings, but viscose wall coverings. The submissions now made is only an after thought.These findings

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 2011 (HC)

M/S. Cover Age, Anand Bhawan Lane Vs. Rourkela Municipality and Anothe ...

Court: Orissa

and marketing agency in the name and style of M/s. COVER AGE. It entered into an agreement with opposite parties to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 02 2010 (HC)

Asha Gold Covering Works.Vs. A.N.A.Haja Mohideen, and ors.

Court: Chennai

1. This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree, dated 29.7.2005, made in A.S.No.379 of 2004, on...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 18 1987 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Popular Cotton Covering Works

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)(43)ELT742TriDel

of the Central Excise Tariff. The assessees, M/s. Popular Cotton Covering Works, however, say that the gods do not become excisable

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 1994 (SC)

Collector of Central Excise, Bombay Vs. Popular Cotton Covering Works

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1994(73)ELT264(SC); JT1994(5)SC292; 1994(3)SCALE841; (1994)5SCC727

reference to the Assistant Collector's observation that the process of covering bare copper or aluminium wire amounted to an incidental or

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 13 2013 (FN)

In the Matter of Digital Satellite Warranty Cover Limited and Another ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

Directive 84/641/EEC so as to add a new Class 18 covering "assistance" in cash or kind to persons who "get into

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Flora Wall Coverings Ltd., Vs. Customs, Bangalore

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

of the case in brief are that M/s. Flora Wall Coverings Ltd., the appellants and M/s. Flora Group, a 100% EOU

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //