Covering - Judgment Search Results
Asha Gold Covering Works.Vs. A.N.A.Haja Mohideen, and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-02-2010
Matched in: Parties Asha Gold Covering Works.Vs. A.N.A.Haja Mohideen, and ors.
M/S. Cover Age, Anand Bhawan Lane Vs. Rourkela Municipality and Anothe ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Dec-23-2011
as follows: 3. The petitioner is an advertising and marketing agency in the name and style of M/s. COVER AGE. It entered into an agreement with opposite parties to carry on trade of putting hoardings/kiosks and back
Flora Wall Coverings Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: May-23-2003
Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC677
against the same impugned Order-in-Original No. 24/2002-Commr/Cus/Adjn dtd. 30.4.2002 and related O-I-O No. 26/2002-Commr/Cus/Adjn dtd.30.4.2002. M/s. Flora Wall Coverings Ltd (hereinafter referred to as FWC) were a 100% EOU operating in Bangalore, engaged in the production of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay Vs. Popular Cotton Covering Works
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-22-1994
Reported in: 1994(73)ELT264(SC); JT1994(5)SC292; 1994(3)SCALE841; (1994)5SCC727
separate name. Thus, the insulated wire was a new substance distinguishable from bare electric wire. The process of covering the bare copper or aluminium wire amounted to an incidental or ancillary process of bringing into existence a
Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Popular Cotton Covering Works
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-1987
Reported in: (1989)(43)ELT742TriDel
becomes assessable again to duty under Item 33-B of the Central Excise Tariff. The assessees, M/s. Popular Cotton Covering Works, however, say that the gods do not become excisable again, since the bare wires have already borne
M/S. Flora Wall Coverings Ltd., Vs. Customs, Bangalore
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jan-12-2001
hearing with the consent of both sides.5. Facts of the case in brief are that M/s. Flora Wall Coverings Ltd., the appellants and M/s. Flora Group, a 100% EOU having their registered Office at No.376/35, 6th cross,
In the Matter of Digital Satellite Warranty Cover Limited and Another ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-13-2013
the Annex. In 1984, it was amended by Directive 84/641/EEC so as to add a new Class 18 covering "assistance" in cash or kind to persons who "get into difficulties while travelling". A number of consequential amendments
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free