Skip to content


Cover - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: cover Page 1 of about 7 results (0.026 seconds)
May 23 2003 (TRI)

Flora Wall Coverings Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC677

(a) the DRI has not seized any of the machinery covered under the hire purchase agreement entered into between M/s SREI

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 2011 (HC)

M/S. Cover Age, Anand Bhawan Lane Vs. Rourkela Municipality and Anothe ...

Court: Orissa

and marketing agency in the name and style of M/s. COVER AGE. It entered into an agreement with opposite parties to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 02 2010 (HC)

Asha Gold Covering Works.Vs. A.N.A.Haja Mohideen, and ors.

Court: Chennai

1. This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree, dated 29.7.2005, made in A.S.No.379 of 2004, on...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 18 1987 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Popular Cotton Covering Works

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)(43)ELT742TriDel

that the wires have cross-sectional areas that would not be covered by Item 33-B(i).

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 1994 (SC)

Collector of Central Excise, Bombay Vs. Popular Cotton Covering Works

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1994(73)ELT264(SC); JT1994(5)SC292; 1994(3)SCALE841; (1994)5SCC727

Collector (Appeals) found force in the assessee's submission that the covering of the bare copper and aluminium wire received by it

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 13 2013 (FN)

In the Matter of Digital Satellite Warranty Cover Limited and Another ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

categories. Ms Anderson also accepted that Class 18 ("Assistance"), which covers contracts of insurance providing assistance for "persons who get into

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Flora Wall Coverings Ltd., Vs. Customs, Bangalore

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

of the case in brief are that M/s. Flora Wall Coverings Ltd., the appellants and M/s. Flora Group, a 100% EOU

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //