Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Court V The - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 11 2011

Ms Singh Engineering Works (P) Ltd. Kanpur Vs. Labour Court. V Kanpur ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-11-2011

was decided in favour of the workmen on 31.07.1975 against which a writ petition was filed in this Court being writ petition no.1403 of 1976 in which an interim order was passed on 20.05.1976 staying operation of … to a workman from an employer under a settlement or an award or under the provisions of Chapter VA or Chapter VB, the workman himself or any other person authorised by him in writing in this behalf,


Jan 05 2007

Chandra Pal Shukla S/O Sri Ram Autar Shukla Vs. Labour Court (V),

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-05-2007

Reported in: 2007(2)AWC1083; [2007(112)FLR845]; (2007)IILLJ644All

Counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition is directed against award dated 12.9.1984 given by Presiding Officer Labour Court (V) U.P. Kanpur in Adjudication Case No. 20 of 1981.3. The case of the workman petitioner was that respondent


May 07 2003

Jeet Lal Vs. the Labour Court-v and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-07-2003

Reported in: (2003)3UPLBEC2300

Anjani Kumar, J.1. This writ petition was heard by this Court and after hearing learned Counsel for the parties, it was dismissed on 7th May, 2003 for the reasons … the petitioner under Section 33-C (2) of the aforesaid Act is not maintainable and therefore, rejected the same vide its order dated 31st October, 1984, thus, this writ petition. The Labour Court has framed the preliminary issue


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 04 2008

U.P.S.R.T.C. Through Its Regional Manager, Jhansi Region Vs. Chhakauri ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jul-04-2008

Reported in: [2008(118)FLR892]

a reliever driver.5. The workman specifically denied the suggestion of the employer in the proceeding before the Labour Court that he was under the influence of liquor as alleged by the employees. The Labour Court on basis … he also submitted that while he was the driving bus on 3.1.1993 on Kanpur Mahoba route, he became very sick and therefore stopped the bus at Maudha. Thereafter he requested the conductor to get a reliever driver.5.


Dec 21 2006

Sri Jayanti Prasad Shukla Son of Sri Ram Swaroop Shukla Vs. the Presid ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-21-2006

Reported in: [2007(112)FLR1206]

workman petitioner was heard.2. This writ petition is directed against award dated 14.7.1986 given by Presiding Officer Labour Court (V) U.P. Kanpur in Adjudication case No. 101 of 1984. The Labour Court decided the matter against the petitioner


Jun 28 1999

In the Karnataka High Court V.K. Singhal, J.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-28-1999

Reported in: (2000)158CTR(Kar)181

to refer to the pending or existing proceeding on the date of issue of notice. The Bombay High Court in D.B.S. Financial Services (P) Ltd. v. Smt M. George Income Tax Officer & Ors.. : [1994]207ITR1077(Bom) has


Jul 09 2004

Garg Plastics Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court V and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jul-09-2004

Reported in: 2004(4)AWC3116; [2004(102)FLR791]; (2005)ILLJ619All; (2004)3UPLBEC2666

of this writ petition are that the State Government referred the following dispute for adjudication to the Labour Court V. U. P., Kanpur which was registered as Adjudication Case No. 293 of 1973 :'Kyo, seva yojakon dwara parishisht


Dec 02 2002

Bellish India Ltd. (Formerly Known as Ape Bellish India Ltd.) Through ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-02-2002

Reported in: 101(2002)DLT493; 2003(66)DRJ215; [2003(96)FLR1008]

Vijender Jain, J.1. Petitioner, aggrieved by the award of the Labour Court has filed the present petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that pursuant to the Industrial Disputes … Vijender Jain, J.1. Petitioner, aggrieved by the award of the Labour Court has filed the present petition. Learned counsel


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial