Court V The - Judgment Search Results
Ms Singh Engineering Works (P) Ltd. Kanpur Vs. Labour Court. V Kanpur ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-11-2011
was decided in favour of the workmen on 31.07.1975 against which a writ petition was filed in this Court being writ petition no.1403 of 1976 in which an interim order was passed on 20.05.1976 staying operation of … to a workman from an employer under a settlement or an award or under the provisions of Chapter VA or Chapter VB, the workman himself or any other person authorised by him in writing in this behalf,
Chandra Pal Shukla S/O Sri Ram Autar Shukla Vs. Labour Court (V),
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-05-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)AWC1083; [2007(112)FLR845]; (2007)IILLJ644All
Counsel for the parties.2. This writ petition is directed against award dated 12.9.1984 given by Presiding Officer Labour Court (V) U.P. Kanpur in Adjudication Case No. 20 of 1981.3. The case of the workman petitioner was that respondent
Jeet Lal Vs. the Labour Court-v and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-07-2003
Reported in: (2003)3UPLBEC2300
Anjani Kumar, J.1. This writ petition was heard by this Court and after hearing learned Counsel for the parties, it was dismissed on 7th May, 2003 for the reasons … the petitioner under Section 33-C (2) of the aforesaid Act is not maintainable and therefore, rejected the same vide its order dated 31st October, 1984, thus, this writ petition. The Labour Court has framed the preliminary issue
18-section briefs on any result in this list
U.P.S.R.T.C. Through Its Regional Manager, Jhansi Region Vs. Chhakauri ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-04-2008
Reported in: [2008(118)FLR892]
a reliever driver.5. The workman specifically denied the suggestion of the employer in the proceeding before the Labour Court that he was under the influence of liquor as alleged by the employees. The Labour Court on basis … he also submitted that while he was the driving bus on 3.1.1993 on Kanpur Mahoba route, he became very sick and therefore stopped the bus at Maudha. Thereafter he requested the conductor to get a reliever driver.5.
Sri Jayanti Prasad Shukla Son of Sri Ram Swaroop Shukla Vs. the Presid ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-21-2006
Reported in: [2007(112)FLR1206]
workman petitioner was heard.2. This writ petition is directed against award dated 14.7.1986 given by Presiding Officer Labour Court (V) U.P. Kanpur in Adjudication case No. 101 of 1984. The Labour Court decided the matter against the petitioner
In the Karnataka High Court V.K. Singhal, J.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-28-1999
Reported in: (2000)158CTR(Kar)181
to refer to the pending or existing proceeding on the date of issue of notice. The Bombay High Court in D.B.S. Financial Services (P) Ltd. v. Smt M. George Income Tax Officer & Ors.. : [1994]207ITR1077(Bom) has
Garg Plastics Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court V and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-09-2004
Reported in: 2004(4)AWC3116; [2004(102)FLR791]; (2005)ILLJ619All; (2004)3UPLBEC2666
of this writ petition are that the State Government referred the following dispute for adjudication to the Labour Court V. U. P., Kanpur which was registered as Adjudication Case No. 293 of 1973 :'Kyo, seva yojakon dwara parishisht
Bellish India Ltd. (Formerly Known as Ape Bellish India Ltd.) Through ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2002
Reported in: 101(2002)DLT493; 2003(66)DRJ215; [2003(96)FLR1008]
Vijender Jain, J.1. Petitioner, aggrieved by the award of the Labour Court has filed the present petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that pursuant to the Industrial Disputes … Vijender Jain, J.1. Petitioner, aggrieved by the award of the Labour Court has filed the present petition. Learned counsel
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free