Court Martial - Judgment Search Results
General Court Martial and ors. Vs. Col. Aniltej Singh Dhaliwal
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-12-1997
Reported in: AIR1998SC983; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)470; 1998(1)ALT(Cri)185; 1998CriLJ1402; 1998(1)Crimes62(SC); JT1998(4)SC228; 1997(7)SCALE717; (1998)1SCC756; [1997]Supp6SCR470; (1998)1UPLBEC24
1(c) of SAO 12/s/SO.23. It is unnecessary for us to consider the discussion of this charge by the Court Martial for on the face of it the charge is unsustainable. The charge is under Para 1 (c) of … made guilty.25. There is no doubt that the High Court has erroneously set aside the findings of the Court Martial on Charges 2, 3 and 8. Now that we uphold the findings of the Court Martial on the
T. Syam Sunder Vs. General Court Martial and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-04-1997
Reported in: 1997(4)ALD637; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)401; 1998CriLJ1454
summary evidence. 4. Brigadier Choudhary Barcharan Singh, officiating General Officer Commanding, 29 Infantry Division convened on 1-11-1989 General Court-martial with Presiding Officer Colonel Shergill Bhopinder Singh and four other members. The proceeding was commenced on 1-11-1989 and
M. Chenchu Rami Reddy Vs. General Court Martial of Ex-army Eme Centre ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-1994
Reported in: 1994(2)ALT68; 1994(2)ALT(Cri)103
was apprehended on 20-9-1988 by the Civil Police and was handed over to the Army authorities. The General Court Martial was convened on 10-9-1990 and the petitioner pleaded guilty of the charges of desertion. The General Court Martial … Court Martial was convened on 10-9-1990 and the petitioner pleaded guilty of the charges of desertion. The General Court Martial convicted the petitioner and imposed a sentence of 7 years rigorous imprisonment. The petitioner questions the sentence of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
A. Jayaram Vs. General Court Martial and ors.
Court: Sikkim
Decided on: Jul-03-1996
Reported in: 1997CriLJ2777
he alleged to have committed some offence for which he was ordered to be tried by a General Court-martial. Four charges were framed against him but the Court-martial exonerated him from two of the charges and he
Ranbir Singh Vs. General Court Martial and anr.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-18-1990
Reported in: 1991CriLJ2850
of 15th Bn. Jat Regt., the petitioner-accused, a sepoy in the said regiment, was tried by the General Court Martial (GCM, for short) and sentenced to suffer death by being hanged by neck till he is dead. The … accused for Nk/Clk Rajinder Singh to take him on 8th March, 1984, for medical examination for his summary court martial to ADS Nowshera. The petitioner was issued rifle 7.62 mm SLR Butt No. 317 registered No. CK-9322 and
Rachpal Singh Vs. Summary General Court Martial and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Dec-20-1971
Reported in: 1973CriLJ1036
trial and conviction of the petitioner under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by a Summary General Court Martial has been referred to this bench by one of us for it raises an important question relating to … civilian, on the night intervening 12th and 13th of June, 1968. He was tried by a Summary General Court Martial (consisting of three officers viz., respondents Nos. 1 to 3) convened by the General Officer Commanding 25, Infantry
Bakhshish Singh Vs. Court Martial and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Oct-04-1971
Reported in: 1972CriLJ1630
Kathua. informing him that the competent Air Force Authority had decided that the petitioner should be tried by Court Martial and requesting him to deliver the petitioner with the statement of the offence with which he was charged … offence with which he was charged to the Officer Commanding Air Force station, Jammu for being tried by court-martial. On receipt of the communication the Special Judge surrendered the petitioner without any demur for trial by a
Major Uday Nangia, Officer's Mess, Officers Training Academy Vs. the A ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-23-2007
Reported in: (2007)4MLJ140
at the earlier point of time.2. The case against the petitioner was taken by the second respondent General Court Martial [for short, 'GCM'] exercising option under Section 125 of the Army Act, 1950, which reads as under:Section 125. … Act, 1950, which reads as under:Section 125. Choice between criminal court and court-martialWhen a criminal court and a court-martial have each jurisdiction in respect of an offence, it shall be in the discretion of the officer commanding
V.C. Rajan and anr. Vs. the Presiding Officer of General Court Martial ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALT745
or direction to call for the records leading to and inclusive of the order passed by the General Court Martial, the 1st respondent herein dated 20-10-1986 as confirmed by the 3rd respondent herein on 16-3-1987. The petitoners in … herein on 16-3-1987. The petitoners in a nutshell pray for a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned Court martial proceedings. 2. The 1st petitioner joined the Indian Army on 11th February, 1971 and the 2nd petitioner joined
V.C. Rajan and anr. Vs. the Presiding Officer of General Court Martial ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-24-2002
Reported in: 2003(6)ALD56; 2003(1)ALT527
that on 11.7.1985 both of them committed theft of 2,400 liters of HS Diesel worth Rs.8352=00. The General Court Martial was convened on 23.7.1986. It assembled from 28.7.1986 till 20.10.1986. In all 26 witnesses were examined by the … The appellants examined one defence witness on their behalf. Documentary evidence was also adduced by the prosecution. The Court Martial on a consideration of evidence on record found both the appellants guilty of the two charges framed against
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free