County Courts - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: county courts Page 1 of about 7 results (0.014 seconds)Scotland County Court Vs. United States Ex Rel. Hill
Court: US Supreme Court
error, obtained a judgment in the court below against the County of Scotland, Missouri, for the sum of $46,944, the amount States ex Rel. Hill, 140 U.S. 41 (1891) Scotland County Court v. United States ex Rel. Hill No. 298 Argued April
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRalls County Court Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
when the subscription was made to its stock by the county court, and when the bonds to pay the subscription were question were issued, purporting to take away from the county courts the power to levy taxes necessary to meet the payments,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCape Girardeau County Court Vs. Hill
Court: US Supreme Court
the full amount of the principal, interest, and costs, the county court "cause to be levied and collected, in the same full amount of the principal, interest, and costs, the county court "cause to be levied and collected, in the same manner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKnox County Court Vs. United States Ex Rel. Harshman
Court: US Supreme Court
and the justices thereof to direct the clerk of the county to draw a warrant on the county treasurer for the Knox County Court v. United States ex Rel. Harshman - 109 U.S. 229
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBraxton County Court Vs. West Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
contrary, that the general statutory law in force required the county to levy a tax in amount sufficient to pay the of its contract obligations, and in such a case the courts will enforce the protective clauses of the federal Constitution against
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCounty Court of Ulster County Vs. Allen
Court: US Supreme Court
Court of Ulster County v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140 (1979) County Court of Ulster County v. Allen No. 77-1554 Argued February car as that phrase is interpreted by the New York courts, and therefore, again as a matter of state law, that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMeriwether Vs. Muhlenburg County Court
Court: US Supreme Court
committed the management of the general financial interests of the county. Adhering to this rule, the court sustained the subscription and 21, 7. The Revised Statutes provide that the county courts shall have jurisdiction to lay and superintend the collection and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>