County Councils - Judgment Search Results
Oxfordshire County Council (Appellants) Vs. Oxford City Council and An ...
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: May-24-2006
public interest." The principal mechanism for preservation was to be a register, maintained by county and county borough councils, which would be a definitive record of all common land and town and village greens. Most of the … greens, described it in a report on the application which he wrote for the registration authority, the Oxfordshire County Council: "The Trap Grounds are nine acres of undeveloped land in North Oxford. They lie between the railway
Carmarthenshire County Council Vs. Lewis
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Feb-17-1955
the Appellants who are the Local Education Authority responsible for the provision and maintenance of schools in the countyof Carmarthen. This school included a nursery school, an infants' school and a junior school, the premises of which … dismissed. Lord Tucker MY LORDS, During the course of this appeal the question was raised whether the Defendant Council owed any duty in respect of the children in its charge to users of the highway adjoining the
Glasbrook Brothers, Limited Vs. County Council of Glamorgan and Others
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Dec-19-1924
"While not desiring for a moment to suggest that " it was not the bounden duty of the County Council " to protect this colliery and not for one moment suggesting " that the performing of a … not desiring for a moment to suggest that " it was not the bounden duty of the County Council " to protect this colliery and not for one moment suggesting " that the performing of a legal
18-section briefs on any result in this list
R (on the Application of Km) (by His Mother and Litigation Friend Jm) ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: May-31-2012
2. In the proceedings, brought by way of judicial review, the appellant challenges a determination made by Cambridgeshire County Council ("Cambridgeshire") and communicated, at the latest, by a letter dated 3 June 2010 to pay him (in … "In this guidance, the issues and support needs that are identified when individuals approach, or are referred to, councils seeking social care support are defined as "presenting needs". Those presenting needs for which a council will provide
Woodland Vs. Essex County Council
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-23-2013
v Nash Dredging and Reclamation Co Ltd [1987] AC 906. The hospital cases 14. In Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, a voluntary hospital operated by a local authority was held liable for the … 2. The issue on the present appeal arises out of an allegation in the Appellants' pleadings that the Council owed her a "non-delegable duty of care", with the result that it is liable at law for any
A (Appellant) Vs. Essex County Council (Respondent)
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-14-2010
Indeed, I would assume that most public authorities in this country do mean well and certainly that Essex County Council does so. But that is not the point. The second question put to us, about the nature … 2 should be interpreted. The underlying premise of the article was that all existing member states of the Council of Europe had, and all future member states would have, an established system of state education. It was
parties : a (Appellant) Vs. Hoare (Respondent), C (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. ...
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Jan-30-2008
difficulty. That was because it was generally believed, on the authority of cases like Trotman v North Yorkshire County Council [1999] LGR 584, that an employer could not be vicariously liable for sexual assaults committed by his … That was because it was generally believed, on the authority of cases like Trotman v North Yorkshire County Council [1999] LGR 584, that an employer could not be vicariously liable for sexual assaults committed by his employee.
Smith (Appellant) Vs. Northamptonshire County Council (Respondents)
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: May-20-2009
Equipment Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/2306), by Mrs Jean Smith, when, in the course of her employment with Northamptonshire County Council as a driver and carer, she was pushing Mrs Cotter in her wheelchair from her home to … HOPE OF CRAIGHEAD My Lords, 1. The appellant, Mrs Jean Margaret Smith, was employed by the respondents (“the council”) as a driver and carer. As part of her job she was required to collect people who were
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free