Counter Will - Judgment Search Results

Counter Point Advt. P. Ltd., Rep. by Its Director, Mr. Naresh Purushot ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2006]133CompCas435(Mad); 2006CriLJ2289; 2006(2)CTC501

under its control or has passed an order for its being wound up, in the ordinary course, it will not be proper to allow proceedings to be started or continued against the company. Section 446 of the

Counter Point Furnishers Cc Vs. Sm Fraser T/a Salica

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

It is possible that in an exceptional case the application of these requirements to a provisional sentence judgment will show that that provisional sentence judgment is appealable. [6] Smit does nothing more than acknowledge a theoretic possibility

Mary Samuel vs Keltron Counters Ltd. and Another

Court: Kerala

PETITIONER/S: MARY SAMUEL INDIA PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLY,, CHALAKUZHY ROAD, PATTOM P.O.,, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADV SRI.VARGHESE PREM RESPONDENT/S: 1 KELTRON COUNTERS LTD. AND ANOTHER REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,, KARAKULAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695 001. 2 STATE OF

Harwansh Kaur Vs. Special Area Development Authority (counter Magnet) ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

recover a sum of Rs. 5000/- towards special damages from plaintiff7 Not proved. (6) Relief and Cost?. Defendants will bear the cost of plaintiff.” After considering the material on record, the relevant Issues were considered by the

“6-c. Exclusion of Counter-claim.- Where a Defendant Vs. Punjab Nati ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

in the suit) only on 12.12.1991. Alongwith their defence incorporated in the written statement, the petitioners filed a counter claim of ` 52,50,88,849/-. However, after the enactment of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial

Reply by Way of Counter Affidavit of Kamlesh Kumari Vs. State of Punja ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Anshul Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. ****** Rajesh Bindal, J. Reply by way of counter affidavit of Kamlesh Kumari, Under Secretary, to Govt. of Punjab, Department of Rural Development and Panchayats, Punjab on

Mulakkal Konan Ramakrishnan Vs. M.C. Batachandran Ezthuthassan, Counte ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1963CriLJ569

committed to trial, then a later decision to retrace the step already taken and to cancel the charge will be justified only by some new item of evidence of fundamental importance revealed in the testimony of the

United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs. the Vysya Bank Ltd., Bvhss Extens ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

plea, such as the complainants son, did not die, due to snake bite, or this kind of death will not cover or come, under the Group Insurance Policy, which is the subject matter. Snake bite is not

Mandavilli Rama Row, Legal Representative of Counter Vs. Sivanarayana ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 49Ind.Cas.629

lower Court must be set aside and the petition dismissed with costs in the' lower Court. Each party will bear his own costs here. Civil Procedure Code (Act V of 1908), Sections 47, 115, 161 - Execution … Court were auction-purchaser of an undefined one-third share in items Nos. 2 to 5 in question here. The counter-petitioners purchased the whole of these properties. Petitioners asked that the counter-petitioners should be restrained from taking possession of

In Re: Somayajulu Ramamurthi-counter

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 17Ind.Cas.251

is a tout or that he is reported such and that a mere report of the Bar Association will Not do. The order is set aside and remanded to lower Court for disposal according of law. Legal