Counsel - Judgment Search Results

Lawyer Vs. Department of Justice

Court: US Supreme Court

plan as an incident of his authority to represent the State in the litigation, and the participation of counsel for each legislative chamber con- 568 Syllabus firms this authority as well as the legislature's continuing refusal to

Advocate Cuddalore; Collector of South Arcot Vs. an Advocate

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1958CriLJ1321

Ramachandra Iyer J.1. The respondent is an advocate practising at Cuddalore, South Arcot District. He was appointed to the office of the Public Prosecutor for a

Advocate General of Madras Vs. Amanullakhan, Advocate, Salem 1

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1967Mad162; 1967CriLJ551

committed was an offence punishable under the Indian Penal Code.(4-A) The other part of the argument of learned counsel is that the facts have to be strictly proved, and that the affidavit of the Magistrate cannot, in

Advocate-general of Madras Vs. Sri Amanullakhan, Advocate

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1966)2MLJ219

committed was an offence punishable under the Indian Penal Code.6. The other part of the argument of learned Counsel is that the facts have to be strictly proved, and that the affidavit of the Magistrate cannot, in

Ashok Pandey, Advocate Vs. Satish Chandra Mishra (Presently, Advocate ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2003)2UPLBEC1294

the nature of quo warranto asking the respondent No. 1 as to how he accepted the appointment as Advocate General for the State of U.P. after being disqualified for the appointment as Judge of the High Court.(ii)

Re:mohit Chaudhary, Advocate Vs. Mohit Chaudhary, Advocate

Court: Supreme Court of India

matter on board an evening before is virtually giving no time to a party situated at Mumbai and counsel at Delhi to prepare. An enquiry be made and practice direction be issued specially concerning all such voluminous

J.R. Parashar, Advocate and ors. Vs. Prasant Bhushan, Advocate and ors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC3395; 2001(49)BLJR2222; 2001CriLJ4207; 2001(4)Crimes217(SC); JT2001(7)SC189; 2001(5)SCALE524; (2001)6SCC735; 2002(1)LC62(SC)

is concerned, he has asserted that while he supported the cause and had espoused it by appearing as counsel before this Court, he did not approve of the holding of a 'dharna' as a way of protesting

State of A.P. Rep. by the Advocate General, High Court of A.P. Vs. S. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(2)ALT461

2, 3, 5 and 6.3. The 1st respondent is also recorded of have expressed regrets, though equivocally. The counsel for the 1st respondent, however, is recorded to have categorically submitted that the 1st respondent offers his sincere

M.S. Rahi, Advocate Vs. Bhoop Singh, Advocate

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2005)140PLR122

is residing Abroad as well as for mother who is residing with landlord.5. Before this Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the landlord has given false affidavit inasmuch as the appropriate sale

State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by the Advocate General Vs. V. Prakasa Ra ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1997(2)ALD(Cri)702; 1997(5)ALT724

Government Pleader that represented the learned Advocate General and Sri E.V.S. Acharyulu, representing Sri K. Venkata Reddy, learned Counsel for the contemner. They have taken us through the entire material on record. Also, we perused the written