Corrugent - Judgment Search Results
Unipack Corrugators India Private Ltd. Vs. Babu Lal Rajak
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-09-2012
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No :3186. Of 2010 Unipack Corrugators India Private Ltd. V/s Babu Lal Rajak & Another Present : Hon’ble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri
Radhas Printers (Corrugated) Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-16-2006
Reported in: (2009)20VST550(Ker)
C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J.1. The common question raised in all these tax revision cases is whether the petitioner is entitled to sales tax exemption as an industrial unit set up by harijans under notification SRO No....
Shunk Corrugators Pvt.Ltd. and 5 ors. Vs. the Bharat Co-op. Bank (Mumb ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-07-2011
ORAL :1 Admit.2 Heard finally by consent.3 The petitioners have challenged the impugned award dated 21st April 2010 passed by the learned Arbitrator appointed under Section 84(4) of the Multi-state Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 on the...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Apex Corrugators Vs. Universal Paper Mills
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-22-1987
Reported in: (1987)0CALLT682(HC)
Sudhansu Sekhar Ganguly, J.1. This is an application Under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure preferred by the defendant/petitioner against order No. 30 dated 3.12.86 passed by Shri S. K. Ghosal, Judge, 5th Bench,...
Corrugating and Paper Processing Company (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-01-1988
Reported in: 1988(17)ECC285,1989(20)LC495(Calcutta),1989(39)ELT35(Cal)
Susanta Chatterji, J.1. The present Rule was issued on 30- 7-1985 at the instance of the writ petitioners Corrugating & Paper Processing Company (P) Ltd. and its Director, praying, inter alia, for a declaration that Section 11-B
Excel Corrugated Boxes (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Dec-02-2004
Reported in: (2005)(182)ELT485Tri(Bang.)
1. M/s. Excel Corrugated Boxes (P) Ltd., Palakkad and the Revenue have filed appeals against the Order-in-Appeal No. 232/03-C.E. dated 31-7-2003. M/s.
Sayee Corrugators, G. Mohan, Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Feb-23-2006
amount of Rs. 50,000/- already deposited by them will be reckoned as part of this amount.Thus, M/s Sayee Corrugators, one of the appellants will have to deposit Rs. 1.5 lakhs (Rupees One lakh and fifty thousands only)
Corrugating and Paper Processing Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-1985
1. Corrugating & Paper Processing Co. Pvt. Ltd. had filed a revision application under the erstwhile Section 36 of the
Corrugated Board India (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-1987
Reported in: (1989)(42)ELT251TriDel
benefit of concession under Exemption Notification 46/71, dated 24-4-1971 as amended by 14/78, dated 24-1-1978 in respect of corrugated board manufactured out of Kraft Paper falling under Item 17(2) of CET. The concession under the notification as
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs. Girnar Corrugators Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-05-2023
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6662 OF2022KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED …Appellant Versus Girnar Corrugators Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free