Corporal - Judgment Search Results

Corporation Vs. Union of India

Court: Kolkata

2013 With AP No.333 of 2007 ASHOKA TUBEWELL & ENGINEERING CORPORATION Versus UNION OF INDIA APO No.207 of 2013 With AP

Corporation Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 13(1977)DLT125; 1979(4)ELT329(Del)

B.C. Misra, J.(1) This writ petition is directed against the orderof the Government of India, dated 23/05/1968, by which ithas...

K.C. Nangia Vs. Corporation and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1987Delhi258; 1987LabIC1686

He submitted a reply to the charge-sheet. Consequently, the respondent corporation appointed one Shri P. G. Nair as Inquiry Officer, The

Akhoy Kumar Banerjee Vs. Corporation

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1914)ILR42Cal625

buildings in suit lie within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Corporation of Calcutta and were originally owned by Saudamini Dasi. On

Bhairab Chandra Kolay Vs. Corporation

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 6Ind.Cas.874

upon the Municipal Magistrate and on the Chairman of the Corporation to show cause why the conviction and sentences passed on

Kwality Manufacturing Corporation Vs. Central Warehousing Corporation

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(4)SC570; 2009(6)MhLJ375(SC); 2009(4)SCALE205; (2009)5SCC142::2009(3)LHSC1432.

said unilateral addition. The payment of Rs. 4,86,114.75 by the Corporation demonstrated that it had accepted 1,45,109 mats (when calculated at

Rajasthan Financial Corporation Vs. Man Industrial Corporation Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC4273; 2003(6)ALT22(SC); [2003]117CompCas110(SC); JT2003(7)SC486; 2003(6)SCALE825; (2003)7SCC522; [2004]49SCL35(SC); 2004(1)LC110(SC); (2003)3UPLBEC2550

Sections 31(1)(a) and (c) and 32 of the State Financial Corporation Act for recovery of a sum of Rs. 10,89,265.88. Parties

Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. Vs. Aes Corporation and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2003(1)ALLMR(SC)352; (2003)1CALLT50(SC); JT2002(8)SC203; (2003)1MLJ51(SC); (2002)7SCC736a; 2003(1)LC40(SC)

With the decision of the Constitution Bench in Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. and Anr. v. RaniConstruction Pvt. Ltd., : [2002]1SCR728 :

Bokajan Cement Corporation Employees' Union Vs. Cement Corporation of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC245; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)11; [2004(1)JCR41(SC)]; 2003(3)JKJ124[SC]; JT2003(8)SC482; (2004)ILLJ197SC; 2003(9)SCALE477; (2004)1SCC142; 2004(1)SLJ485(SC); (2004)1UPLBEC46

Act') and clause 5 of the Constitution of Bokajan Cement Corporation Employees' Union. The High Court has held that the membership

Mineral Exploration Corporation Employees' Union Vs. Mineral Explorati ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2006(111)FLR409]; JT2006(7)SC151; (2006)IIILLJ482SC; (2006)4MLJ1212(SC); 2006(7)SCALE374; (2006)6SCC310

Lakshmanan, J.1. The appellant before us is the Mineral Exploration Corporation Employees' Union (AITUC) through its General Secretary, Respondent No. 1