Corked - Judgment Search Results

Indian Cork Mills Private Ltd. Vs. P. Unnikrishnan of Bombay and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1988(4)BomCR127; [1989(58)FLR139]; 1989MhLJ24

an industrial dispute raised against the petitioner by the 1st respondent.2. The petitioner Company is a manufacturer of cork products and has a factory at Powai, Bombay-12. The workman was working as a supervisor in the stopper

Cork Industries and ors. Vs. A. Govindarajulu Mudaliar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1965Mad87

S. Ramachandra Iyer, C.J.(1) This is an appeal from the judgement of Srinivasan, J. who confirmed the order of the Master granting the respondent leave to sue in forma pauperis. A preliminary question as to the...

Cc Vs. Cork International (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2000)(93)LC169Tri(Chennai)

1. By this application, the Commissioner is seeking condonation of delay of 25 days on the simple ground that there was a delay in receipt of relevant files from the group and the absence of the...

Indian Cork Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(90)ECC615

1. Appeal No. 1/75 arises out of the Order-in-Original bearing No.V-15A (15)2/73, dt. 24.10.74 passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay, by which he passed the following order: (1) confiscation of 158 rolls of PVC...

Indian Cork Mills Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1984)(18)ELT606TriDel

1. The captioned appeal was initially filed as a revision application before the Central Government which, under the provisions of Section 35-P of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, has come as transferred proceedings to...

Mysore Cork Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1991)(56)ELT160Tri(Chennai)

1. The matter had come up for hearing earlier when the Tribunal had directed the same to be transferred to the Special Bench, as it appeared that interpretation of Notification 213/86 would fall for consideration.2. The...

Crown Cork and Seal Co., Inc. Vs. Parker

Court: US Supreme Court

Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. Parker - 462 U.S. 345 (1983) U.S. Supreme Court Crown Cork & Seal

Crown Cork and Seal Co. Vs. Ferdinand Gutmann Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Ferdinand Gutmann Co. - 304 U.S. 159 (1938) U.S. Supreme Court Crown Cork &

Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Vs. Cork Manufacturin ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2008SC56; 2007(6)ALD85(SC); 2007(4)AWC3774(SC); JT2007(10)SC473; 2007(10)SCALE515; (2007)8SCC120

TARUN CHATTERJEE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 20th January, 2006 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh whereby the High Court affirmed the concurrent...

Sheikh Sajuddi Mandal and ors. Vs. F.L. Cork and E.N. Forbes and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 46Ind.Cas.41

Charles Chitty, J.1. This is a Rule granted to the petitioners, who may be called the Mandals, calling on the District Magistrate of Burdwan and the opposite party, i.e., the Equitable Coal Company, to show cause...