Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Copied - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 17 1979

Dondeti Copi Reddy and ors. Vs. Shri Anjaneya Swamyvaru Agraharam and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-17-1979

Reported in: AIR1980SC105; (1980)1SCC498; 1979(11)LC593(SC)

ORDER1. The appellants claim to be tenants of certain lands under two lease deeds executed in their favour by one Bachinabu Subbayya. The lands belonged to two temples which brought the present suits against the appellants...


Feb 15 2022

Copy Tech Business Machines Pvt. Ltd., vs the Assistant State Tax Offi ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-15-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 26TH MAGHA, PETITIONER: COPY TECH BUSINESS MACHINES PVT. LTD., ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED BY ITS...


Jun 01 2010

Diamond Copy House Vs M/S Oriental Insurance Company Ltd and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-01-2010

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the reporter or not?3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest? 1. This application has been moved by the...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 16 2014

Let Three Copies Each of the Writ Petition Be Vs. Shashi Bhushan Sharm ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-16-2014

Mohinder 2014.01.30 12:10 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.665 of 2014. [2].Let three copies each of the writ petition be supplied to the learned State Counsel and learned counsel for respondent Nos.2


Feb 17 2014

a Copy of the Orders Dated 6.2.2014 and Today Be Sent to the Vs. Unkno ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-17-2014

CM-1678-2014 in CWP-2228-2014 .Jagmohan Singh Bhatti versus Panjab University, Chandigarh & others Present: Mr.Jagmohan Singh Bhatti, Advocate/Applicant in person .The writ petition was filed seeking quashing of the decision of the Syndicate dated 4.1.2014 resolving to...


May 27 1992

Copy-max Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Scor. Duplicators Company (P) Ltd.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-27-1992

Reported in: 1992(1)WLN315

1956 for winding up of the non-petitioner Company.2. The petitioner's case is that it sold one plain paper copier machine in January, 1 987. One post dated cheque for Rs. 10,000/- was given and the remaining amount


Apr 29 1991

Photo Copy Centre Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-1991

Reported in: (1991)(56)ELT801TriDel

Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Calcutta.2. The case of the Department is that appellants imported 7 PCS.Complete photo copiers in SKD condition under two Bills of Entry. They filed one bill of entry declaring the goods as


Jun 17 2009

Trm Copy Centres (Uk) and Others (Respondents) Vs. Lanwall Services Li ...

Court: House of Lords

Decided on: Jun-17-2009

per copy that is provided for in the agreement. The retailer undertakes to collect all sums paid for copies made on the photocopier and to account for them to TRM. He is entitled to deduct from those


Sep 01 2005

Paras Traders Vs. Rajasthan Copy Maufacturers Association

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-01-2005

Reported in: 125(2005)DLT712

Vijender Jain, J. 1. Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, this appeal has been preferred.The dispute is with relation to trademark CHETAK and label CHETAK which according to the...


Apr 07 2014

M. Raja Manohar Vs. Superintendent Central Copying Section Principal D ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Decided on: Apr-07-2014

copy application by paying application fees of Rs.1/- to the opposite party no.1 by registered post for certified copies of documents under Rule 203(A) of A.P.Civil Rules of Practice and Circular Orders 1990. 3. The complainant simultaneously


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial