Cooperative Societies Act - Judgment Search Results

Sind Coop. Hsg. Society, a Cooperative Society Under Maharashtra Coope ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR3416; (2009)226CTR(Bom)145; [2009]317ITR47(Bom); [2009]182TAXMAN346(Bom)

right to decide how to distribute or pay the surplus on winding up. Section 110 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as Act) read with Rule 90 of the M.C.S. Rules (hereinafter referred to as … premium received by him from the purchaser was exigible to tax. After considering the provisions of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961, the Gujarat High Court noted that the corpus of fund is not divisible as such pro rata

Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Being a Cooperative Society Regist ... Overruled

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2005Bom385; 2005(4)ALLMR875; 2005(6)BomCR55; 2006(2)CTLJ105(Bom); 2005(4)MhLj629

Matched in: Parties Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Being a Cooperative Society Registered Under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Vs. State Bank of India (Dombivli Industrial Estate Branch) and the State Bank of India

Friends Cooperative Housing Society Limited Duly Registered Under the ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(5)ALLMR815; (2008)110BOMLR3204

agreement dated 27/1/1970 executed between the petitioner and the respondent NIT. The petitioner Society was registered under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act vide registration No. 246. On 23/2/1968, the petitioner-society purchased land area 6.81 Hects. Kh. No. 15 and 17 … between the petitioner and the respondent NIT. The petitioner Society is a Housing Society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The Society has developed various layouts and flat schemes for its members. In one of its layout at

Manratna Developers, a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Provision ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(6)ALLMR550; (2008)110BOMLR3571; 2009(2)MhLj115

floors. The said constructed building is occupied by the flat purchasers who are the members of the Plaintiff Cooperative Housing Society. The suit has been filed by the cooperative housing society, voicing the grievance of the Society … the change in position of law will have to be addressed to. Section 7 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 ('MOFA' for short') was interpreted by the Bombay High Court in Kalpita Enclave Cooperative Housing Society v.

Poornaprajna House Building Cooperative Society Ltd., a Cooperative So ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2007Kant136; 2008(1)KarLJ672

'O') and for certain other reliefs.2. Petitioner is a Cooperative Society registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959. The second respondent is a member of the petitioner - Society. He had filed two applications dated

The Cosmopolitan Cooperative Housing Society Limited, a Society Regist ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2009AP136; 2009(3)ALT693

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is, Cosmopolitan Cooperative Housing Society. It acquired the lands in Sy.Nos.16 and 17 of Mansoorabad Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, … to the lands in Sy. Nos. 16 and 17, the prohibition contained under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 etc., would get attracted. An important aspect, to be taken note of in this case, is that

Radhika Property Developers Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under th ...

Court: Mumbai

and the Agreements and the development so made by the petitioner, based upon the same and as other societies members including the plaintiffs' members have been enjoying the construction and all the facilities as provided by the … and the area as per the Agreements accordingly. The petitioner is under obligation to execute Conveyance, subject to cooperation from all members, as per the Consent Terms and the Agreements as claimed after completion of the construction … without providing the detail and description of the property just cannot be acted upon. Therefore, both the parties have full knowledge of the nature of

Nariman Nassarwanji Dubash and Mrs. Homai Nariman Dubhash Vs. Clover C ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(1)ALLMR239; 2005(1)BomCR166; 2004(4)MhLj717

was marked as Exh. B. Reference is made to some documents in the proceedings before the Registrar of Cooperative Societies which are really not relevant. In his examination he has deposed that one Masuda Khan was in possession … and hence became the tenant of the suit premises under provisions of Section 5(ii)(c) of the Bombay Rent Act. It was further averred that on the death of Dhanjishaw, rent was being paid to both Baiamai and