Conviction - Judgment Search Results

Life Convict Lal Singh @ Manjeet Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) 181 OF2012Life Convict Lal Singh @ Manjeet Singh …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab & Anr. …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.In view

Life Convict Bengal @ Khoka @ Prasanta Sen Vs. B.K. Srivastava and Oth ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

the sentence for the purpose of consideration of remission as per the Statute/Policy applicable on the date of conviction and pass appropriate orders in terms of the above decision within a period of eight weeks from the

Life Convict Bengal@khoka@ Prasanta Sen Vs. B.K. Srivastava and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

the sentence for the purpose of consideration of remission as per the Statute/Policy applicable on the date of conviction and pass appropriate orders in terms of the above decision within a period of eight weeks from the

Life Convict Laxman Naskar Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC2762; 2001(1)BLJR701; 2000CriLJ4017; JT2000(10)SC29; 2000(6)SCALE223; (2000)7SCC626; [2000]Supp3SCR62

the Constitution seeks for the release of the petitioner who is undergoing imprisonment for life after having been convicted under Section 302, I.P.C. read with Section 34, I.P.C. The claim of the petitioner is that he has

Poulose, Convict No.481/16, Central Prison, Kannur vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

allowed. The judgmentunder challenge is set aside. The finding of guilt against both accused, and the orders of conviction and sentence are reversed. Accused 1 and 2 are found not guilty for offences charged against them and

Hussainkutty @ Assanar Convict No.966 Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

417 & 506 (ii) IPC.3. At the hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant fairly admitted that the conviction under Sections 380 and 417 IPC cannot be challenged. No doubt, there is clinching evidence to prove that

A Convict Prisoner in the Central Prison Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1993CriLJ3242

1236 females). A good many of them were first offenders, almost 10,000. 976 had suffered at least two convictions and 718 at least three convictions. These hardened criminals influence the first offenders, and the prisons become schools

Life Convict Karam Singh Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 1993CriLJ3751

to the Government for consideration and decision. The parole period cannot be counted for calculating 14 years jail sentence under Section 433-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2. In order to substantiate the submission that parole period

Sarapada Jamatia (Convict) Vs. the State

Court: Guwahati

J.C.1. The convict Sarapada Jamatia in Sessions Case No. 5 of 1953 has appealed from Jail against his conviction and sentence of 10 years R. I. passed by the Sessions Judge, Tripura, on 8-5-53 under Section 304,

Ganesh Prasad, Convict Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1954CriLJ216

had been charged with having committed offences during a period exceeding one year. He accordingly set aside the conviction and sentence and remanded the case to the Magistrate for retrial after reforming the charge in the light