Contract Act 1872 Section 10 - Judgment Search Results

Radhabai Vs. Arunagiri,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)2MLJ880

also relied on the decision AIR 1993 SC 956 (Mst. Sethani v. Bhana) wherein it is observed as follows:Contract Act (1872), Section 23 - Undue influence - Onus to prove - Sale deed by tribal woman, who was old, illiterate … the decision : [1963]1SCR456 (Mst. Kharbuja Kuer v. Jangbahadur) wherein it is observed as follows:Evidence Act (1872), Sections 101-103 - execution of document by pardanashin lady - burden to establish that she executed it after understanding, is

M.S. Madhusoodhanan and anr. Vs. Kerala Kaumudi Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2003(6)ALD1(SC); [2003]117CompCas19(SC); (2003)4CompLJ185(SC); 2003(6)SCALE191; (2004)9SCC204; [2003]46SCL695(SC)

party is capable of being made certain and is not invalid as provided under Section 29 of the Contract Act, 1872 [See: Illustration (e)]. In view of such categoric and clear statutory provisions, the submission of learned counsel representing … may agree to sell his shares to a person of his choice. Such agreements are specifically enforceable under Section 10 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, which corresponds to Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1977. The

Raghunath Misra Vs. Kishore Chandra Deo Bhanj and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1958Ori260

materially affected on the petitioner who impugns the validity of the election, though under the English Act (Ballot Act, 1872, Section 13), the burden is upon the respondent to show the negative, i.e., that the result of the election … the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the Act shall be exercised by the Sarpanch elected under Section 10, who shall act under the authority of the said Grama Panchayat. Under Section 10, every Grama Sabha shall … made thereunder, to transfer any property held by it, to enter into contracts and to do all other things necessary for the purpose of carrying

Punjab National Bank Vs. M/S Bijlee Construction

Court: Delhi

Respondent within a period of four weeks from today. Civil procedure code , 1908 - section 100 - Contract Act, 1872- Section 10 55,56,70,73 - Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 - Section 34 - 1st appeal - appellant filed against Arbitration

Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur and anr.;state of Maharashtra Vs. State of Ma ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(11)SC47; 2009(11)SCALE327; (2010)14SCC641; 2010AIRSCW2574; 2011(3)SCC(Cri)867; [2009] 12 SCR 1093

5, M Zuber Kasam Shaikh and Accused 6, Fazal Mohd Shaikh were contract killers who were working for Chotta Shakeel and Faheem. It has been … police officer to be taken into consideration (1) Notwithstanding anything in the Code or in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (I of 1872), but subject to the provisions of this section, a confession made by a person before … Section 9; or (f) brings into, or take out of, India, any arm or ammunition in contravention of Section 10; or (g) transports any arms or ammunition in contravention of Section 12; or (h) fails to deposit arms

Standard Chartered Bank Vs. Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd. and or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC3626; 2006(5)SCALE384; (2006)6SCC94; [2006]68SCL109(SC); MANU/SC/2534/2006

inference is a presumption which the court is entitled to draw under Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 read with illustration (g) thereto. Mr. Jethmanlani contended that the weight of the authorities would show that unless … B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. These two appeals under Section 10 of the Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as … Court had made the following findings:The object and consideration of the suit contracts are purchase/sale of the securities and payment of price. Such securities contracts

Atluri Brahmanandam (Died) Adusumalli Leelaratna Kumari Vs. Anne Sai B ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2008AP235; 2008(4)ALD808; 2008(5)ALT56

a custom or usage, whether in regard to a tenure or a contract or a family right, is repeatedly brought to the notice of the … Court ruled that if the Court takes judicial notice of such custom under Section 57 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, no further proof is required. Keeping this in mind, the submission of learned Counsel for the appellant that … is a custom applicable to Seetharamaiah's family to adopt a child above 15 years of age as per Section 10(iv) of Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, (the Act, for brevity), presumption as to validity under Section 16

S. Waryam Singh Duggal Vs. Savitri Devi

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1984Delhi214

Devi conceded that the principle was not applicable. It is apparent from section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that to found an estoppel it must be shown that the person to whom the representation was made … the 4th Additional Rent Controller.(2) The petitioner is Waryam Singh Duggal, the aggrieved tenant. He is a building contractor. The respondent is Savitri Devi, the wife of Shri Dheram Pal. She is the owner of the house … of 1981 entitled Bhagat Ram Jain vs. Susheela Devi Beri, decided on 10th August 1981(7), the petition for eviction contained no allegation at all that

Patakamuru Damodar Prasad and anr. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(6)ALD67; 2003(1)ALT407

misrepresentation without proof of deceit or intention to deceit cannot vitiate the contract or render the contract void; it is only voidable. In the field … be drawn from admitted and/or undisputed facts. When fraud is inferred under Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the Court as well as the authority alleging fraud can ignore a decision obtained by fraud. 19. All … surplus land is determined, it has to be surrendered and the Government has to take possession thereof under Section 10 of the Act. Under Section 11 of the Act, the surrendered land absolutely vests in the Government free

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Girdhari Lal and Etc.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1998Raj240; 1998(3)WLC76; 1998(1)WLN216

under Section 115. CPC? 2. This question arises in (he following circumstances - (i) In connection with the contract works certain dispute arose between the Union of India and the contractor non-petitioners. Thereafter Claims were referred to … bonds of procedure of (i) the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 as well as of (ii) the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. This provision is intended also to enable the. arbitral tribunal to decide disputes ex aequo et bono as … inferior to such principal civil Court, or any Court of small causes.' 10. Section 5 of the New Act provides that no judicial authority shall