Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Contest - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 05 1962

Brookshire Vs. Contestible

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-05-1962

BROOKSHIRE v. CONTESTIBLE - 371 U.S. 68 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court BROOKSHIRE v. CONTESTIBLE, 371 U.S. 68 (1962) 371 U.S. 68


Nov 09 2012

“contesting This Petition One of the Defences Vs. State of Haryana a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-09-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Arbitration Case No.5 of 2012 Date of Decision:09. 11.2012 M/s Kumar Construction Company ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ..Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE....


Sep 16 2013

Notice of Motion to Contesting Respondents Only. Vs. State of Haryana ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-16-2013

to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.20354 of 2013 & connected matters [2].Notice of motion to contesting respondents only. On our asking Mr.S.S.Patter, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on their behalf. Let


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial