Contempt - Judgment Search Results

Contempt Proceedings Vs. Kanwar Singh Saini Overruled

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 161(2009)DLT466

ORDERP.K. Bhasin, J.1. A Reference was made to this Court by a Civil Judge for initiation of contempt proceedings against one Kanwar Singh Saini, who was the sole defendant in a Civil Suit for injunction (hereinafter

Under Contempt of Courts Act Vs. Indira Datt Nayak

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1994(0)MPLJ126

ORDERP.N.S. Chouhan, J.1. This is a reference under Section 15(2) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter the said Act).'2. Shri Sharad Kumar Gupta, Civil Judge Class and J.M.F.C, Lakhnadon,

R.S. Ramachandran Vs. Contempt Proceedings Initiated by the Court on I ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1975Delhi868

August, 1974. A notice to show cause why action should not be taken against the respondent under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter called 'the Act') in respect of the said letter, dated 3rd June 1974,

A.K. Das and anr. Vs. Brojinder Nath Dhur (for Contempt)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1986(Supp)SCC572

court is directed to deliver vacant possession to the landlord with police help, if necessary. The applications for contempt are discharged. - [ M.M. Dutt and; O. Chinnappa Reddy, JJ.] -- Rent Control and Eviction - Eviction

This Order Will Dispose of Two Contempt Petitions Filed by Amar Vs. Un ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Mr.Pawan Kumar, Advocate for Mr.Amit Chopra, Advocate. Mr.Anant Kataria, AAG, Punjab. M.M.S.BEDI,J. This order will dispose of two contempt petitions filed by Amar Singh and another (COCP No.1056 of 2013) and Balkar singh (COCP2018of 2013).The petitioners in

Suo Motu Contempt Application No. 426 of 1994 Vs. Mrs. Manonmani Muthu ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1995)1MLJ375

ORDERSrinivasan, J.1. This is a suo motu contempt proceeding initiated by us. The respondent herein filed W.P. No. l 1238 of 1994 questioning the validity of

In the Matter of Contempt of Court Proceedings Vs. K.S. Sethi

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1972Delhi113

my Lord the then Chief Justice with a note that the contemner had already been found guilty of contempt on 23-11-1967 and sentenced to four months' simple imprisonment plus a fine of Rs. 1,000.00 by 1. D.

In the Matter Of: Contempt of H.L. Sehgal Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1985Delhi921

Nos. 2 and 3 in that reply. We arc satsfied that the contemner did nto intend to commit contempt of Court and perhaps in his enthusiasm, he was misled into ventilating his grievances in this reply.(2) Action

Matter of the Contempt of Court Vs. D.B. Vohra and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1974Delhi466

and Bishan Dayal, Advocates and Shri Vinod Sethi to show cause why they should not be punished for contempt of the Court of Shri Ravi Kumar Sub-Judge 1st Class, Delhi, as alleged in the statement of Shri