Contemn - Judgment Search Results
Sri Swami Nath Yadav and ors. Vs. Contemners
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-28-2000
Reported in: 2001CriLJ639
is made returnable at 10 A.M. of Tuesday dated the 6th April, 1999.We are making clear that the contemners are also required to be present personally at 10 A.M., along with their show cause, if any.Let notices
Contemner: M. Babu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-04-1997
Reported in: 1999(1)CTC115
ORDER1. The contemner herein filed O.P.No. 749 of 1993 for grant of Letters of Administration with a Will dated 5.8.1991 executed
In Re: Vinay Chandra Mishra (The Alleged Contemner)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-10-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC2348; 1995(1)ALT(Cri)674; 1995CriLJ3994; (1995)2GLR992; JT1995(2)SC587; 1995(2)SCALE200; (1995)2SCC584; [1995]2SCR638; 1995(2)LC93(SC)
Solicitor General of India was requested to assist the Court in the matter. Pursuant to the notice, the contemner filed his reply by affidavit dated 10th May, 1994 and also an application seeking discharge of show cause
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Court on Its own motion Vs. K.K. Jha 'Kamal' and Ashok Kumar Gupta (Co ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-03-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)BLJR2545
Jha 'Kamal' a lawyer practicing in this Court as well as against his client Ashok Kumar Gupta, the contemners is a chequered one. The details are as follows:(a) A title suit was filed by the respondent 3
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Ashok Kumar Kapoor, Contemner
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-28-1997
Reported in: 1998CriLJ806
V.K. Bali, J.1. R. S. Mittal, S. Advocate with Mrs. Arti Gupta, for Petitioner; Ashok Kumar Kapoor, Contemner in person. The contemner herein Mr. Ashok Kumar Kapoor is a lawyer practising in District Courts at Ludhiana.
Mahananda Banerjee Vs. Hasim Abdul Halim, West Bengal Legistative Asse ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-20-1997
Reported in: (1998)1CALLT39(HC),1997(2)CHN562,1997CriLJ3676
the prayer of the petitioner was allowed and the review application was directed to be withdrawn.9. The alleged contemnor thereafter was given an opportunity of hearing whereafter by reason of an order dated 4.3.1992 passed by the
In Re: District Magistrate, Rajnandgaon, Contemner
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-20-1975
Reported in: 1975CriLJ1766
R.K. Tankha, J.1. The present contempt proceedings against contemner, Arun Kshetrapal, District Magistrate, Rajnandgaon, arise out of his refusal to comply with this Court's order dated 1-8-1975
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free