Contemn - Judgment Search Results
Sri Swami Nath Yadav and ors. Vs. Contemners
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-28-2000
Reported in: 2001CriLJ639
dated the 6th April, 1999.We are making clear that the contemners are also required to be present personally at 10 A.M.,
Contemner: M. Babu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-04-1997
Reported in: 1999(1)CTC115
ORDER1. The contemner herein filed O.P.No. 749 of 1993 for grant of Letters
In Re: Vinay Chandra Mishra (The Alleged Contemner)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-10-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC2348; 1995(1)ALT(Cri)674; 1995CriLJ3994; (1995)2GLR992; JT1995(2)SC587; 1995(2)SCALE200; (1995)2SCC584; [1995]2SCR638; 1995(2)LC93(SC)
the Court in the matter. Pursuant to the notice, the contemner filed his reply by affidavit dated 10th May, 1994 and
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Court on Its own motion Vs. K.K. Jha 'Kamal' and Ashok Kumar Gupta (Co ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-03-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)BLJR2545
as well as against his client Ashok Kumar Gupta, the contemners is a chequered one. The details are as follows:(a) A
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Ashok Kumar Kapoor, Contemner
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-28-1997
Reported in: 1998CriLJ806
Advocate with Mrs. Arti Gupta, for Petitioner; Ashok Kumar Kapoor, Contemner in person. The contemner herein Mr. Ashok Kumar Kapoor is
Mahananda Banerjee Vs. Hasim Abdul Halim, West Bengal Legistative Asse ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-20-1997
Reported in: (1998)1CALLT39(HC),1997(2)CHN562,1997CriLJ3676
the review application was directed to be withdrawn.9. The alleged contemnor thereafter was given an opportunity of hearing whereafter by reason
In Re: District Magistrate, Rajnandgaon, Contemner
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-20-1975
Reported in: 1975CriLJ1766
R.K. Tankha, J.1. The present contempt proceedings against contemner, Arun Kshetrapal, District Magistrate, Rajnandgaon, arise out of his refusal
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free