Container - Judgment Search Results
Perma Container (Uk) Line Limited and Another Vs. Perma Container Line ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-09-2014
partial final award dated 30th January, 2013. The petitioners in Arbitration Petition No. 259 of 2013 i.e. Perma Container (UK) Line Ltd. are hereinafter referred to as the claimant. The original respondents i.e. Perma Container Line (India)
M/S. Container Movement (Bombay) Transport Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Capital ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2000
Reported in: 2000IVAD(Delhi)852; 86(2000)DLT150; 2000(54)DRJ100; (2000)126PLR20
Matched in: Parties M/S. Container Movement (Bombay) Transport Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Capital Cargo and Container (India) Pvt. Ltd.
S.d. Containers Indore Vs. M/s. Mold Tek Packaging Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-01-2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3695 OF2020(@ SLP (C) No.11488 OF2020 S.D. CONTAINERS INDORE .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S. MOLD TEK PACKAGING LTD. .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. The present appeal has been
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Container Corporation Of India Limited Vs. Ajay Khera
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-11-2024
the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 and raised an important issue of the pollution created by the Inland Container Depot (for short, ‘the said ICD’) at Tughlakabad. It is alleged in the application that the said ICD
S. K. Containers Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Susmita Bhattacharya and Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-28-2017
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) No.343/2016 IN CIVIL APPEAL No.2318/2014 S. K. CONTAINERS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS SUSMITA BHATTACHARYA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)/ ALLEGED CONTEMNOR(S) AND CIVIL APPEAL No.2318/2014 JUDGMENT
Contship Container Lines Ltd. Vs. D.K. Lall and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-16-2010
Reported in: 2010(2)SCALE148
M/s Lall Enterprises against respondent-National Insurance Company Ltd. while granting relief in part to the complainant against Contship Container Lines Ltd., the shipping company to whom the consignment in question was entrusted for delivery to the consignee
Marine Container Services South Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Go Go Garments
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-23-1998
Reported in: 1998VIAD(SC)12; AIR1999SC80; JT1998(4)SC322; (1998)IIMLJ65(SC); RLW1999(1)SC3; (1998)3SCC247
Matched in: Parties Marine Container Services South Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Go Go Garments
Jayesh Containers Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Baroda and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-14-1994
Reported in: 1996(84)ELT7(SC); (1998)8SCC666
ORDER1. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal directed against the judgment and order passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, is whether the Tribunal committed any error...
Containers Corporation Vs. Registrar, the Customs, Excise and Gold (Co ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-10-1986
Reported in: 1987(13)ECC57; 1986(24)ELT173(SC); 1986(1)SCALE366; (1986)2SCC333
a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act and are engaged in the activity of manufacturing metal containers. According to the appellants, they started manufacturing metal containers in the year 1974. On 30th December, 1976, they
Container Corporation of India Ltd vs.titagarh Wagons Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:10. 04.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 312/2016 & IA No.8092/2016 CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ........ Petitioner versus TITAGARH WAGONS LTD. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free