Consumer Protection Amendment Act - Judgment Search Results

Mrs. M. Raghava Rani Vs. the Govt. of A.P., Rep. by Its Ex-officio Sec ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2004AP478; 2004(4)ALD454; 2004(5)ALT188

resigned:Provided also that a person appointed as the President or as a member, before the commencement of the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002, shall continue to hold such office as President or member, as the case may be, till the … the vacancies in question?5. It is to be noted that sub-section (1-A) of Section 10 was introduced by Consumer Protection Amendment Act, 1993 with effect from 18-06-1993. Prior to the said amendment, the Members of the District Forum including the

Alka Mohan Wahi Vs. District Supply Officer/Assistant Director, Varana ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1998(3)AWC1608

and a member of District Forum, as the case may be.'The definition of 'member' has been inserted by Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993.10. Now we would like to straightaway quote Section 29A of the Act which was inserted by Act … which is mentioned in Section 2(jj) of the Act: ' The definition of 'member' has been inserted by Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993. 10. Now we would like to straightaway quote Section 29A of the Act which was inserted by

Shrikant G. Mantri Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court: Supreme Court of India

and enlarge the scope of areas covered, the legislature brought certain amendments to the said Act by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as “1993 Amendment Act”). One of the objects of 19 the said Act was … make the said Act more effective by removing various lacunae, the legislature amended the said Act by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “the 2002 Amendment Act”). One of the objects for bringing out the 2002

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Harsolia Motors

Court: Supreme Court of India

post­amendment 1993 finally held as under: “21. We must, therefore, hold that:20. (i) The explanation added by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act 50 of 1993 (replacing Ordinance 24 of 1993) with effect from 18­6­1993 is clarificatory in nature and applies

M/s Daimler Chrysler India Pvt.ltd. Vs. M/s Controls

Court: Supreme Court of India

with trade and traffic or commerce in general, is occupied with business and commerce.16. The Explanation [added by Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act 50 of 1993 replacing Ordinance 24 of 1993 w.e.f. 18-6-1993]. excludes certain purposes from the purview of the

Rohit Chaudharyand . Vs. M/s. Vipul Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

the larger sense of user of services.21. We must, therefore, hold that: (i) The explanation added by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act 50 of 1993 (replacing Ordinance 24 of 1993) with effect from 18-6-1993 is clarificatory in nature and applies … with trade and traffic or commerce in general, is occupied with business and commerce. The Explanation (added by Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act 50 of 1993 (replacing Ordinance of 24 of 1993 w.e.f. 18.06.1993) excludes certain purposes from the purview of

Bunga Daniel Babu Vs. M/S Sri Vasudeva Constructions and Ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

connotative expanse of the term “consumer” in the unamended definition, the Court considering the Explanation added by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993 (50 of 1993) ruled that the said Explanation is clarificatory in nature and applied to all pending … It is necessary to mention here that the definition of the term “consumer” has been amended by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 2002 (62 of 2002) with effect from 15.03.2003. Be it stated, clause 2(1)(d)(ii) was substituted. We think it

Tamil Nadu Housing Board and ors. Vs. Sea Shore Apartments Owners Welf ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2008SC1151; 2008(1)AWC514(SC); (2008)1CompLJ260(SC); I(2008)CPJ45(SC); 2008(1)CTC245; [2008(1)JCR168(SC)]; JT2008(1)SC318; (2008)2MLJ278(SC); 2008(3)RLR2073; 2008LABIC2038; 2008(2)ICC8; 2008AIRSCW1080; 2008(3)CivilLJ7; 2008(2)KCCRSN102; 2008(1)SCALE201

been included in the definition of 'service' in Clause (o) of Section 2(1) of the Act by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993 [Act 50 of 1993]. But it was submitted that the 'fixation of price' cannot be made subject

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

in sub-section (3), a person appointed as a President or as a member before the commencement of the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act, 1993, shall continue to hold such office as President or member, as the case may be, till the

Ms. National Seeds Corpn. Ltd. Vs. M. Madhusudhan Reddy and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

for the purpose of earning his livelihood, by means of self-employment; (The explanation was substituted w.e.f. 15.3.2003 by Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act 62, 2003) (f) `defect' means any fault, imperfection or shortcoming in the quality, quantity, potency, purity or standard … resale or for any commercial purpose. By virtue of the explanation which was added w.e.f. 18.6.1993 by the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Act 50 of 1993, it was clarified that the expression `commercial purpose' used in sub-clause (i) does not include