Consumer Protection Act - Judgment Search Results
B. Mohanlal Naik (Dr.) Vs. District Consumer Forum Constituted Under C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-26-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)ALT634
of action arose within the jurisdiction of the District Consumer Forum of Mahaboobnagar.4. Under Section 11(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the District Consumer Forum will have jurisdiction to entertain the complaint even if part of cause of … the District Consumer Forum at Mahaboobnagar has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.3. A perusal of the complaint goes to show that the complainant issued a legal notice dated 26.04.2008, calling
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, a Statutory Corporation C ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-24-2008
Reported in: 2008(4)ALLMR806; 2008(5)BomCR546
public Undertaking must have spent much more on this frivolous litigation. The respondent No. 1, who is a consumer, had a service line which got disconnected and destroyed because of the construction of a flyover without her … any other cause beyond his control. Replacements necessitated on account of increased load demanded subsequently or any wilful act or default on the part of the consumer will however, be carried out by the Undertaking at the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free