Consumer Protection - Judgment Search Results

Consumer Protection Council Vs. A'bad Muni. Corporation

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2000)3GLR727

B.C. Patel, J. 1. The petitioner, Consumer Protection Council, which is registered under the provisions of the Societies Act 1860 and under the provisions of Bombay

Environment and Consumer Protection Foundation. Vs. Delhi Administrati ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Matched in: Parties Environment and Consumer Protection Foundation. Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

The Consumer Protection Committee vs C.S.Rajan

Court: Kerala

ASHADHA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 28 OF 2013 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.3849/2012 DATED 07.06.2012 ------------ PETITIONER: THE CONSUMER PROTECTION COMMITTEE, (UPABOTHKRITHA SAMRAKSHANA SAMITHY), REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, SRI.M.P.JOSE, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, MANLIL PARAMBIL HOUSE, ATHANI

Consumer Protection Council. Vs. National Highways Authority of IndiA.

Court: Chennai

by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J)1. The present Writ Petition is a public interest litigation at the instance of the Consumer Protection Council, Tiruchirappalli, for a Mandamus to direct the first and second respondents to expeditiously implement their expression of … District Collector shows as regards the provision of underpass at 'G' corner in the representation made by the Consumer Protection Council to the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, the work was already over.6. Learned counsel for the petitioner

The Consumer Protection Council Ahmedabad Vs. National Dairy Developme ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1992(23)DRJ92

the subject matter of the complaint was far in excess of Rs. 10 lakhs.(2) The complainant is the Consumer Protection Council, Ahmedabad, which is a registered Consumer Association. The first Opposite Party in the petition is the National … parly in connection with purchase and sales of ground-nut oil in the State of Gujarat under the The Consumer Protection Council Ahmd. v. National Dairy Devip. Board and Others 95 Essential Commodities Act or any other law in

Gujarat State Consumer Protection Centre Vs. Bank of Baroda and Anothe ...

Court: Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Ahmedabad

any application for condonation of delay. 3. It is settled legal position that under Section 24A of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, a Consumer Fora is under duty to dismiss the complaint filed beyond period of limitation, if … Under the circumstances, we pass the following order. ORDER Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1)(g), 15, 24-A - Cases Referred: 1. SBI of India v. B.S. Agricultural Industries,

Consumer Protection Council of Kerala, Rep. by Its General Secretary a ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Matched in: Parties Consumer Protection Council of Kerala, Rep. by Its General Secretary and Another Vs. Shri. S. Elango, General Manager and Others

Consumer Protection Council, Tamilnadu Vs. the Branch Manager State Ba ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Trichy, aggrieved by the order of the District Forum, since his complaint was dismissed, filed this appeal, alongwith consumer protection council. 2. The complainant had approached the opposite party bank, for a housing loan of Rs.14 lakhs. The

Consumer Protection Council Tamilnadu and Another Vs. the Managing Dir ...

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

settled that œsufficient cause? for condoning the delay in each case is a question of fact. Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, a special period of limitation has been provided to ensure expeditious disposal of cases. Complaint has … the Court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the

Chairman, Thiruvalluvar Transport Corporation Vs. Consumer Protection ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC1384; [1995]83CompCas82(SC); 1995(1)CTC393; JT1995(2)SC441; 1995(1)SCALE525; (1995)2SCC479; [1995]2SCR1; 1995(1)LC463(SC)

whether the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter called 'the National Commission') constituted under Section 20 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short 'the 1986 Act') had jurisdiction to adjudicate upon a claim for compensation arising out … and hit against the iron side-bar, sustaining a serious head injury. Subsequently he succumbed to the injury. The Consumer Protection Council, Tamil Nadu, on behalf of the legal representatives of the deceased lodged a complaint before the National