Consumer Forum - Judgment Search Results

Applicants and Consumers' Forum vs the Union of India

Court: Kerala

and 3, relevant portion of which reads thus:3. At the very outset, it is submitted that thepetitioner/’Applicants and Consumer Forum’ has no locus standi to file the above writ petition as it has filed to establish that they … the petitioneris a registered society, it is submitted that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of approaching the Consumer Forum, and could even obtain an interim relief in the said proceedings, and therefore, could not have approached this

Deputy Commissioner-cum-district Magistrate Vs. District Consumer Foru ...

Court: Guwahati

Reported in: AIR2007Gau94

By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30-8-2001 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Darrang, Mangaldoi in CPA No. 3(DM-2) 99 by which an award to the tune of Rs. 1,80,000/- was … damaged condition.3. Being aggrieved by the damage caused to his vehicle, the claimant/respondent No. 2 approached the District Consumer Forum, Mangaldoi (for short 'the Forum') seeking relief under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short,

B. Mohanlal Naik (Dr.) Vs. District Consumer Forum Constituted Under C ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(3)ALT634

filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the entertainment of CD. 140/2008 by the 1st respondent-District Consumer Forum, Mahaboobnagar, as illegal and without jurisdiction.2. Sri P. Veera Reddy, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, submits that … cause of action arose at Mahabubnagar, as admittedly, the 2nd respondent who is a complainant before the District Consumer Forum was treated at Kurnool and thereafter, he was treated at Hyderabad, therefore, it cannot be said that the

Reheemunnissa Vs. District Consumer Forum and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2009AP100

ORDERG. Rohini, J.1. This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the Order passed by the District Consumer Forum Prakasam District dated.26-04-2007 in E.P. No. 3 of 2007 in C.D. No. 116 of 2000 prohibiting the petitioner … registered sale deed dated 30-11-2005 from the respondent No. 6 herein. By notice dated.04-04-2007 issued by the District Consumer Forum Prakasam District, the petitioner was called upon to appear before the Forum on 26-04-2007 and to show cause

Deputy Commissioner-cum-district Magistrate Vs. District Consumer Foru ...

Court: Guwahati

Reported in: AIR2007Gau94

By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30-8-2001 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Darrang, Mangaldoi in CPA No. 3(DM-2) 99 by which an award to the tune of Rs. 1,80,000/- was … damaged condition.3. Being aggrieved by the damage caused to his vehicle, the claimant/respondent No. 2 approached the District Consumer Forum, Mangaldoi (for short 'the Forum') seeking relief under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short,

The State of Jharkhand Vs. the District Consumer Forum and Another

Court: Jharkhand

employee), retired as Constable from Excise Department of the State Government. He filed a case before the District Consumer Forum, Palamau at Daltonganj against the District Provident Fund Officer, Palamau, which was registered as Case No. 112 of … order dated 27/08/2002, the Forum allowed the said prayer of the employee. 2. The question of jurisdiction of Consumer Forum was not raised before the Forum. However, by filing this writ petition, such question has been raised on

Warangal District Co-operative Central Bank Limited Vs. District Consu ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(1)ALD273; 2000(2)ALT391; [2000]101CompCas24(AP)

this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders passed by the District Consumer Forum, Warangal in CD No.798 of 1993 dated 25-10-1994.2. The facts leading to the filing of the revision petition … the recovery proceedings was returned to him. The 2nd respondent, however, filed a complaint petition before the District Consumer Forum, Warangal, under the provisions of the Consumers Protection Act, 1986 alleging that there was delay in releasing the

Kailash Chand Gupta Vs. State Commission Consumer Forum, U.P., Lucknow ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1997All312

Agra Forum. In this connection, lie has invited the attention of the Court to S. 10 of the Consumer Protection Act. 1986 (hereinafter referred to the Act).2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

Bundelkhand University Vs. District Consumer Forum and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1998)3UPLBEC1963

been held that holding of an examination is a service and hence, the matter is cognizable by the Consumer Forum. The respondent No. 2 was a student of B.Sc. III year at Vipin Bihari Degree College, Jhansi and … by the impugned order, and hence this petition.5. The impugned order refers to some order of the National Consumer Forum holding that the holding of examination, declaration or result etc. is a service, and hence the matter comes

Food Corporation of India and Anr. Vs. District Consumers' Forum and O ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1998]91CompCas518(Cal)

the West Bengal M. R. Distributors' Association, Nadia District Committee, filed an application and/or complaint before the District Consumer Forum, Nadia, being Case No. 4 of 1993, against the F.C.I. and its Nadia District Authority alleging that M. … F.C.I. filed an application contending that the application/complaint filed by the association was not maintainable and the District Consumer Forum had no jurisdiction to entertain the same since an association of M. R. Distributors could not be said