Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: chennai Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 280 results (1.303 seconds)State Vs. C. Sambandam
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-18-1980
Reported in : 1980CriLJ1198
for human consumption or at any rate it is an article which ordinarily entered into or is used in the composition of the article of food kept by the local health authority analysed by the central food laboratory 6 the supreme court acquittal of the accused by the learned sessions judge the criminal appeal fails and is dismissed the act was sent to the accused in this case therefore i have no reason to interfere with the acquittal of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Board of Revenue Vs. T. Rangn ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Nov-10-1980
Reported in : (1981)1MLJ474
fall under any other articles of schedule i to the indian stamp act 1899 we may point out that the learned to be treated only as a declaration of trust under article 64 clause a and there is no contention that it had also not been discharged and he had executed a power of attorney in favour of his brother peria thiruvadia pillai is not an agreement in writing to make any disposition therefore it cannot fall within the first limb of the inclusive
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Pitchai and anr Vs. Cholan Roadways Corporation and anr.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Apr-08-1980
Reported in : (1981)IILLJ116Mad
duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him functions mainly of a managerial nature it to take in persons who are exercising supervisory function and therefore when the intention of the parties was to adopt an
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohamed Khan Sahib Vs. Ali Khan Sahib and anr.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Nov-04-1980
Reported in : AIR1981Mad209
of acknowledgment is based on the assumption of a lawful union between the parents of the acknowledged child the doctrine how doubted since they are official documents maintained according to the procedure contemplated under french code civil except for a denial that legitimacy established unless the marriage has been disproved it is therefore clear that where the paternity of a child cannot be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKuppuraj Vs. K. Arjunan and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Apr-16-1980
Reported in : (1981)1MLJ222; 1993LW711
plaintiff on this sole ground namely bar of limitation under article 67 of the schedule to the limitation act it is fees act 1955 for the purpose of court fee and jurisdiction article 67 of the schedule to the limitation act of thus become the absolute owner of the entire property and therefore the first defendant was entitled to execute the conveyance validly
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohammed Khan Sahib Vs. Ali Khan Sahib and anr.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Nov-04-1980
Reported in : (1981)1MLJ402
child the doctrine however is not applicable where the lawful union between the parents of the child is not possible as doubted since they are official documents maintained according to the procedure contemplated under the french code civil except for a bare legitimacy established unless the marriage has been disproved it is therefore cear that where the paternity of a child cannot be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJanaki Ammal Vs. Alagar Kothan
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Nov-25-1980
Reported in : (1981)1MLJ487
an application for amendment the decree after dealing with the scope of section 14 and section 18 of the act the limitation for a judgment debtor to file an application for amendment the decree after dealing with the scope of section 14 shall notwithstanding any thing contained in the code of civil procedure 1908 amend the decree accordingly or enter satisfaction as the the clause on the application of the decree holder and therefore the said six months period would not be attracted to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Tamil Nadu-iv Vs. M.R.M.M.M.M. Manickam Ch ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Apr-15-1980
Reported in : (1980)19CTR(Mad)247; [1981]127ITR498(Mad)
to mean a partition which partial as regards the persons constituting the huf or the properties belonging to the huf or them on partition the novelty or peculiarity of such a procedure cannot in any way affect the legality of he partial the tribunal was bound to recognise it 5 there could therefore be no doubt that even with respect to a portion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadurai District Co-operative Supply and Marketing Society Limited by ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jun-16-1980
Reported in : (1982)1MLJ140
common law only withholds from the court s powers the power to order reinstatement of the dismissed workman in the event namely that the industrial disputes act provides for a comprehensive procedure and an adequate remedy for dismissed workmen and thereby the employee in a matter concerning the latier s dismissal must therefore be regarded as a dispute which does not arise out
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. S.S.M. Lingappan
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-11-1980
Reported in : (1980)18CTR(Mad)56; [1981]129ITR597(Mad)
the company or against the wishes of the company will constitute a benefit or perquisite obtained from the company by such in the context of s 2 6c iii of the indian i t act 1922 and it was pointed out that said section is accepted it would mean that even an article or money of the company misappropriated or forcibly taken against a benefit by a director from the company without its authority or knowledge the company can always insist on the restitution 2 24 iv of the i t act 1961 and therefore the amounts could not be assessed as the income of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT