Conserve - Judgment Search Results

The Chief Conservator Officer Forest Department Haryana and Another Vs ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** LPA No.827 of 2014 (O & M) Date of decision : 7.7.2014 The Chief Conservator Officer, Forest Department, Haryana and another ........Appellants versus Sita and another ....Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble

The Conservator And Custodian Of Forest Vs. Sobha John Koshy .

Court: Supreme Court of India

COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO._414 of 2021 (arising out of SLP(C)Nos.27651 of 2008) THE CONSERVATOR AND CUSTODIAN OF FOREST & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SOBHA JOHN KOSHY & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ASHO K BHUSHAN,

Chief Conservator Of Forest Vs. Virendra Kumar

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2024(Arising out of SLP (C) No.22617 of 2011) CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST & ORS. …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS VIRENDRA KUMAR & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT VIKRAM NATH, J.1. Leave granted.2. This

Chief Forest Conservator (Wild Life) and ors. Vs. Nisar Khan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC1867; [2003(2)JCR161(SC)]; 2003(2)SCALE458; (2003)4SCC595; [2003]2SCR196; 2003(1)LC598(SC)

ORDER1. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 27th August, 1993 passed by a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc. Writ No. 36693 of 1991 whereby and whereunder a...

Chief Conservator of Forests, Govt. of A.P. Vs. the Collector and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC1805; 2003(4)ALD27(SC); [2003(2)JCR175(SC)]; JT2003(5)SC210; (2003)2MLJ57(SC); 2003(2)SCALE429; (2003)3SCC472; [2003]2SCR180

the Forest Department appearedto have taken the plea that the lands in question were forestlands and the Chief Conservator of Forest (Appellant No. 1 inCivil Appeal No. 8580 of 1994) expressed that the lands inquestion were forest

Princl. Chief Conservator of Forest and anr. Vs. J.K. Johnson and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2011(4)KLT98(SN)(C.No.110); (2011)10SCC794; 2012(1)SCC(Cri)431; 2012(1)SCJ603; 2012(2)MLJ257; AIR2012SC61; 2012(1)LW(Crl)407

they were willing to pay money by way of composition of the offence.4. On August 10, 2004, the Conservator of Forests, Nizamabad Circle, Nizamabad on the report submitted by the Divisional Forest Officer, Medak that the accused

Chief Conservator of Forests and Another, Etc. Etc. Vs. Jagannath Maru ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC2898; JT1995(9)SC465; (1996)ILLJ1223SC; 1995(7)SCALE101; (1996)2SCC293; [1995]Supp6SCR259; 1996(1)LC484(SC)

Two questions in the main need our determination in this batch of appeals which are by the Chief Conservator of Forests, State of Maharashtra. The first and foremost question is whether Forest Department of the State Government

Assistant Forest Conservator and ors. Vs. Sharad Ramchandra Kale

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1998SC2927; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)258; 2000(121)ELT14(SC); JT1997(9)SC641; (1998)1SCC48

Petition No. 104 of 1988.2. The truck of the respondent was ordered to be confiscated by the Assistant Conservator of Forests, as it was found involved in commission of a forest offence. That order was confirmed by

Chief Conservator of Forests and ors. Vs. Rattan Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC166; 1966MhLJ905(SC); [1966]SuppSCR158

500 as penalty under r. 30(1) of the Forest Contract Rules. An appeal against the order to the Conservator of Forests, and a revision petition to the Chief Conservator of Forests, Madhya Pradesh, were unsuccessful. The respondent

The Deputy Conservator of Forest and Others Vs. Anwar Ali Khan

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

Oral Judgment: 1. Complaint (ULPA) No. 16 of 1999 filed before the Labour Court at Gondia under Section 28 read with Item 1 of Schedule IV of M.R.T.U and P.U.L.P Act challenging the oral termination by...