Consequential - Judgment Search Results

MartIn Vs. Her Majesty's Advocate

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... purpose of the provision 92 the paragraph refers to modifications which are incidental to or consequential on provision made which does not relate to reserved matters the adjectives suggest the kinds ..... which is usually consigned to a schedule as mentioned already at para 72 above typical consequential amendments are concerned to modernise the language of an existing provision or to update legislative .....

Agori Nishad Navik Evam MatasyA. Vs. State of U.P. and Others.

Court: Allahabad

..... for the respondents that when the main order is not under challenge challenge to the consequential orders cannot be entertained the division bench judgment of sushila chitra mandir supra relied on ..... case which may warrant the petitioner to file the second writ petition 7 challenging the consequential order withoutchallenging the basic order is also not permissible 8 in c p chitranjan menon .....

Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs. Randhir Singh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2010(3)SC472,RLW2010(2)SC1118

..... legal necessity or for benefit of the family and iv for consequential injunctions restraining defendants 1 to 4 from alienating the suit ..... c provides that in suits for a declaratory decree with consequential relief the court fee shall be computed according to the ..... it clear that where the suit for declaratory decree with consequential relief is with reference to any property such valuation shall .....

Delhi Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Sh. Bhim Singh

Court: Delhi

..... stereotype order dated 15th december 1998 and ordering that the respondent shall be entitled to consequential benefits and allowing the original application of the respondent 2 the respondent was served a ..... removal from services the respondent was gainfully employee and therefore he is not entitled for consequential benefits 18 the other case relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioner .....

Kalabharati Advertising .Vs. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... their grievances stood fully redressed by the interim orders passed by the high court and consequential orders passed by the corporation the order passed by the corporation could not be challenged ..... meeting his waterloo there subsequently after obtaining the interim orders from the high court and consequential orders from the corporation withdrew the writ petition the respondent nos 1 to 5 for .....

Union of India by Secretary, Department of Posts, and ors Vs. Ramesh H ...

Court: Karnataka

..... dak sevak gds bpm and had sought for quashing of the said order and for consequential benefits the tribunal allowed the application of the respondent and directed reinstatement of the respondent ..... tribunal and holding that the respondent is entitled to reinstatement as postal assistant without any consequential monetary benefits he shall however be entitled to continuity of service and the order of .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Shri ManjuddIn Khan

Court: Delhi

..... respondents in different writ petitions forthwith the respondents were also held to be entitled to consequential benefits as admissible in law however the petitioners were permitted to initiate the inquiry from ..... respondents and directed the petitioner to reinstate the respondents in service and also granted them consequential benefits as admissible in law and also held that it will not preclude the .....

Paritosh Singh and Others. Vs. State of U.P. and Others.

Court: Allahabad

..... the commercial tax department various anomalies would result with regard to fixation of seniority and consequential promotion etc with regard to both direct recruits and the promotees in the commercial ..... the trade tax commissioner to take necessary action for repatriation the trade tax commissioner passed consequential order of repatriation in june 2008 the petitioners cannot said to be working in .....

In the Matter Of: Nb Sub Vijay Bahadur Singh Versus the Union of India ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... consideration is whether the applicant is entitled for promotion to the rank of subedar with consequential benefit the applicant pursuant to the delhi high court order was promoted to the rank ..... promotion the applicant cannot claim promotion to the rank of subedar and subedar major with consequential financial benefits since he did not meet the criteria for any further promotion beyond naib .....

Suresh Prasad Yadav S/O Sri Singheshwari Pd. Yadav Vs. the State of Bi ...

Court: Patna

..... to the post of lecturer and reader as well with all consequential benefits he submits that instead of granting the same benefits to ..... the post of lecturer under the statute and for grant of consequential benefits he submits that as per the documents annexed with the ..... the post of lecturer he will be entitled to all the consequential benefits including arrears of salary etc and any further benefit also .....